Search for: "Todd Moore v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2008, 1:11 am
  What I mean is, you remember yesterday where I asked a bunch of questions about that story where Mike Moore said he got a text message from Lon Stallings debunking Judge Lackey's testimony in the Jones v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 5:08 pm by pittlegalscholarship
UC Berkeley Law and Society Elizabeth Brown (San Francisco State Criminal Justice) and Michael Musheno (Berkeley Law) UCLA Faculty Mondays Todd Presner (UCLA Digital Humanities) presents “Geo-Humanities: How Digital Cultural Mapping and Social Media are Unlocking History. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 12:53 am
Moore, where the Supreme Court held that an arrest supported by probable cause satisfies the Fourth Amendment even if the arrest violated state law. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:58 am by Amy Howe
Coverage of yesterday’s grant in Moore v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 7:37 am by AskPat
Moore told a high school to ban the book for violating separation of church and state. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am by Roshonda Scipio
., 1943-Boulder, CO : Westview Press, c2011.AfricaKQC90 .M88 2010The golden book : philosophy of law for Africa creating the National State of Africa under God : the key is the number seven. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
On 17 February 2015, the Court of Appeal (Moore-Bick P, Black and Lewison LJJ) gave judgment in the case of JX MX (A child proceeding by her Mother and Litigation Friend Mrs AXMX) v. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Almost every newspaper, local and national has carried hysterical and inaccurate pieces setting out doomsday scenarios if section 40 is enacted and consistently misdescribing the Leveson system of audited self-regulation as “state backed” (or even “state”) regulation. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Moore, No. 07-3434 Denial of an application for habeas corpus from a conviction and sentence for gross sexual imposition and rape is affirmed where petitioner's Fifth Amendment guarantee against double jeopardy was not violated because the requisite high degree of necessity existed for a mistrial. [read post]