Search for: "Tomlinson v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 338
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2019, 3:56 am
Mr Ver was represented by Iain Wilson and Tom Double of Brett Wilson LLP and Hugh Tomlinson QC and Ian Helme of Matrix Chambers. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 2:35 am
We have had over 400,000 page views this year, more than half from the UK with the United States, Australia, Malaysia and India making up the rest of the top five. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:30 am
In the case of Barbarevech v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am
It is said that it should have applied the approach in Galloway v Telegraph ([2006] EWCA Civ 17) and should only have overturned the judge’s decision on balancing conflicting Convention rights if it was “plainly wrong”. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 7:00 am
However, there are actually at least four federal decisions characterizing the pay as a wage: Tomlinson v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 1:55 am
MS (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 21 November 2019. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 2:30 am
AM (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4-5 December 2019. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 2:49 am
Harding v Wealands [2007] 1 AC 1, under the pre-existing English rules of applicable law). [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:25 pm
City of Lodi (2006) 144 Cal.App.4th 865, 875, fn. 8; Tomlinson v. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 5:31 am
We have had over 450,000 page views this year, more than half from the UK with the United States, Australia, Hong Kong and Ireland making up the rest of the top five. [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:06 pm
In addition to requiring the state to inform it of just satisfaction to individual applicants, the member state is required to implement general measures to ensure future applicants are not affected. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 2:00 am
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 9:32 am
It applied the principles laid down by the House of Lords in the case of Tomlinson v Congleton DC [2004] AC 46 in interpreting the 1957 Act. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 1:00 am
This has recently been developed from an understanding of the right as being a relatively narrow one, which is to do with receiving information that others are willing to impart (found in Leander v Sweden (1987) EHRR 43), to a relatively broad one, which now encompasses receiving information held by an organ of the state, free of unjustified administrative obstacles (found in Tarsasag a Szabadsagjogokert v Hungary (2009) ECHR 618 and Kenedi v Hungary (2009) ECHR… [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 2:00 am
Indeed, as Tomlinson LJ observed, the period of inactivity was seven and a half months. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 3:24 am
We have had 425,000 page views this year, more than half from the UK with the United States, India, Australia and Ireland making up the rest of the top five. [read post]
11 May 2015, 4:24 pm
In the case of Armellini v Austria (Judgment of 16 April 2015) the First Section of the Court of Human Rights dismissed an Article 10 complaint by applicants who had been found guilty of defaming professional footballers by accusing them of taking bribes. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 5:22 pm
Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 2:02 am
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 1:42 am
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
