Search for: "Tomlinson v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 338
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm
Dominic Ponsford in the Press Gazette said that IMPRESS differs little from IPSO but that “the state should not force publishers into it. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 4:05 pm
The News and Observer, a newspaper from Raleigh, North Carolina, is to pay $7.5 million in damages for defaming a state government employee in 2010. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:31 pm
Ingenious Media and Patrick McKenna were represented by Hugh Tomlinson QC and Jessica Simor QC (both of Matrix Chambers), instructed by Olswang LLP. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:09 am
Ingenious Media and Patrick McKenna were represented by Hugh Tomlinson QC and Jessica Simor QC (both of Matrix Chambers), instructed by Olswang LLP. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 4:32 pm
InFacts v Daily Express. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am
We had a post about this case by Hugh Tomlinson QC. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:09 pm
Canada In the case of J.K. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 5:35 am
State v. [read post]
30 May 2016, 1:52 am
V. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm
On 16 May 2016 Sir David Eady heard a PTR in the case of Bloor v Beresford. [read post]
8 May 2016, 4:15 pm
Supreme Court‘s recent decision in Pritchard v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 4:05 pm
United States In the Hulk Hogan case Gawker has filed motions seeking a new trial. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 4:43 pm
The question is not whether some readers would have misunderstood the satire as stating facts but whether the average or reasonable reader would have come to that view. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm
On 16 and 17 March 2016, there was a two day hearing in Decoulos v Axel Springer Schweiz AG & ors On 11 March 2016 there was a judgement in the case of Monarch Airlines Ltd v Yaqub. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 12:52 am
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a member of Matrix chambers and an editor of Inforrm [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm
On the same day Dingemans J gave judgment in Lokhova v Tymula ([2016] EWHC 225 (QB))(heard 26 and 27 January 2016). [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 4:10 pm
In the case of Ewing v Crown Court sitting at Cardiff and Newport ([2016] EWHC 183 (Admin)) confirms an important feature of the open justice principle: that permission is not needed in order to take notes in Court. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 3:53 pm
Tomlinson v. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 4:04 pm
It stated that the claimant had been passing confidential information to ex-employees of CSP who were working for a rival agency and that criminal proceedings were being considered (for the full text, see [4]). [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:08 pm
– Hugh Tomlinson QC Case Law: Gulati v MGN Ltd, A landmark decision on the quantum of privacy damages – Hugh Tomlinson QC and Sara Mansoori How to avoid defamation – Steven Price Defamation Act 2013: Does section 1 replace the test of the hypothetical reasonable reader by that of the twitter troll? [read post]
