Search for: "Tomlinson v. Tomlinson" Results 141 - 160 of 532
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2007, 3:36 am
The federal Louisiana Katrina insurance lawsuit was dropped right before it went to the jury, presumably in a walk-away settlement to avoid sanctions after it was revealed that the plaintiff couple (the wife of which is a lawyer) triple-dipped a... [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:22 am
Radiocomms Systems Ltd v Radio Communications Systems Ltd & Tomlinson [2010] EWHC 149 (Ch), a decision of Mr Justice Floyd (Chancery Division, England and Wales, 15 January 2010), is one such case. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 12:14 am by 1 Crown Office Row
  In the case of Glik v Cunniffe (26 August 2011) the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that there is a First Amendment right to record police activity in public. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:07 am by INFORRM
The appeal in the case JIH v News Group Newspapers ([2010] EWHC 2818 (QB)) was heard today by the Master of the Rolls, Lord Justice Maurice Kay and Lady Justice Smith. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:25 pm by INFORRM
  In the second part of this three part series, first posted in March 2010, Hugh Tomlinson QC looks at the development of the “right to reputation” in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 12:52 am
On this point, Tomlinson J referred to FNCB v Barnet Devanney [1999] Lloyd's Rep IR 459 at 468 and to Talbot Underwriting v Nausch Hogan & Murray [2006] 2 Lloyd's Rep 195 at 218 that established that it was the duty of a broker to obtain, as far as is possible, insurance coverage which clearly meets his client's requirements. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
– Brian Cathcart Case Law, Strasbourg: ML and WW v Germany, Article 8 right to be forgotten and the media – Hugh Tomlinson QC and Aidan Wills Case Law: Venables v News Group Papers, Application to Vary Confidentiality Injunction Dismissed, PJS extended – Samuel Rowe Case Law: Lachaux v Independent Print, Supreme Court abolished common law presumption of damage in libel cases – Mathilde Groppo Supreme Court considers social media defamation:… [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am by INFORRM
  In the oft quoted words of Willes J in East v Holmes ((1858) 1 F&F 347, 349), “If a man wrote that all lawyers were thieves, no particular lawyer could sue him unless there was something to point to the particular individual“ In the leading English case of Knupffer v Express Newspapers ([1944] AC 116) the “Daily Express” published an article referring to “The quislings on whom Hitler flatters himself he can build a pro-German movement within… [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 11:52 pm
In DHL GBS (UK) Limited v Fallimento Finmatica SPA [2009] EWHC 291 the English High Court declined an application by DHL GBS (UK) Limited (DHL) to stay its own appeal against the registration of an Italian judgment which had been entered against it. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:44 am
In the case of Harrison & ANOR v Black Horse [2011] EWCA Civ 1128 it was held that a lender's failure to disclose to borrowers that it received commission for selling them payment protection insurance did not amount to unfairness under s.140A and s.140B Consumer Credit Act 1974 (the Act).The borrowers were told that the Payment Protection Plan premium was £10,200. [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Hugh Tomlinson’s excellent post came as a welcome reassurance that the Misuse of Private Information (“MOPI”) tort should survive the proposed repeal of the Human Rights Act 1998 (“HRA”). [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:10 am by Anita Davies
The jury in the Tomlinson inquest returned a verdict of unlawful killing on Tuesday. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 2:35 am by INFORRM
– Philip Steele News: Privacy injunction granted against the Sun, first reported privacy injunction of 2017 Case Report: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Days 1 and 2: claimant’s evidence and defendant’s closing submissions Case Law: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Success for claimant in Twitter libel case – Nathan Capone Case Law, India: Puttaswamy v Union of India, Supreme Court recognises a constitutional right to privacy in a landmark judgment –… [read post]