Search for: "Tonja"
Results 81 - 100
of 146
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2020, 6:22 am
Other Supreme Court-related news and commentary from around the web: The Supreme Court We Need (Linda Greenhouse, The New York Review of Books) The Dishonesty of Amy Coney Barrett’s “Textualist” Pose (Simon Lazarus, The New Republic) The Most Useless Job Interview Ever (David Cohen, Rolling Stone) Barrett Won’t Pull Away From Trump’s Coattails (Kenneth Jost, Jost on Justice) Week Two of the 2020 Supreme Court Term: Oral Argument Analysis (Tonja Jacobi &… [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 6:06 pm
” She pointed out that an important 2017 Virginia Law Review article by Tonja Jacobi and Dylan Schweers has had a significant impact on how Chief Justice Roberts conducts oral argument (the article is “Justice, Interrupted: The Effect of Gender, Ideology and Seniority at Supreme Court Oral Arguments” available on SSRN here). [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 7:25 am
In a recent paper, The Role of Theory in Empirical Legal Studies, Tonja Jacobi (Emory) makes this case in a brief and widely accessible paper. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:47 pm
[Huffington Post] * I was on the radio yesterday talking Obamacare with Northwestern Law professor Tonja Jacobi and SCOTUSblog’s Amy Howe. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 6:30 am
At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag analyze the recent oral argument and predict a win for the challengers in Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Association v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 1:06 pm
The upcoming Supreme Court nomination being a foremost concern, one of the articles that got me to stop cleaning is Ideology and Exceptionalism in Intellectual Property, by Matthew Sag, Tonja Jacobi and Maxim Sytch. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 6:11 am
The study to which Justice Sotomayor referred is "Justice, Interrupted: The Effect of Gender, Ideology and Seniority at Supreme Court Oral Arguments," by Tonja Jacoby and Dylan Schweers, which was published in the Virginia Law Review. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 4:02 am
” In The Washington Post, Tonja Jacobi and Dylan Schweers lay out their research showing “that the male justices interrupt the female justices approximately three times as often as they interrupt each other. [read post]
8 May 2019, 3:45 am
” At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag analyze participation by advocates in Supreme Court arguments this term, concluding that “the Supreme Court Bar is still largely a ‘boys club’”: “[W]omen account for 17.7% of Supreme Court advocates in OT2018,” and “when they do get a chance to appear, they are not given as much chance to actually speak. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 5:57 pm
Lorentz of Davis Wright Tremaine on the firm’s blog, Payment Law Advisor DeLorean Flies into the Future with a Trademark Infringement Lawsuit – Alexandria, VA lawyer Mari-Elise Taube of Stites & Harbison on the firm’s blog, Trademarkology 6 Words That Cost An NBA Star $25,000 – Miami lawyer Andrew Rodman of Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson on the firm’s blog, BeLabor the Point Employment Litigation is Too Expensive – San Antonio attorney… [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 3:18 pm
Said a senior vice-president at the publisher, “we talked to her through her lawyer and friend Tonja Carter”, such that communicating with Ms Lee “wasn’t necessary. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 6:02 am
Sorkin’s depiction of Atticus because [Tonja B. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:35 am
” At Aeon, Tonja Jacobi and Dylan Schweers explain that their “new research on interruptions among justices during Supreme Court oral arguments indicates that women still do not have an equal opportunity to be heard in the highest court in the land. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 3:50 am
At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag tell the story of how Supreme Court oral argument transcripts and audio came to be readily available, which, they observe, reflects “the sometimes-odd interaction between the very staid institution of the Supreme Court and quickly changing technology. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 3:59 am
” Briefly: In op-ed for The New York Times, Leah Litman and Tonja Jacobi maintain that during the recent telephonic arguments at the Supreme Court, for which the chief justice served as timekeeper, Roberts’ “uneven application of the rules was … gendered and ideological, as interruptions have been in previous courts. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 3:55 am
At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag discuss data from their recent paper on laughter at Supreme Court oral arguments, arguing that laughter can be used to predict case outcomes because “for the most part, the justices use courtroom humor intentionally and strategically. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:54 am
” At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag agree with this prediction, noting that their “empirical analysis of the Preap oral argument suggests that Kavanaugh will be loyal to the Republicans”; they go on to observe that “[c]onsidering all four cases the Court heard in Kavanaugh’s first week on the Bench, the newest justice may not be ideologically moderate, but so far he has been moderate in his behavior, in some senses. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 3:45 am
” At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag explain that “[i]f you wanted to know which way Justice Gorsuch was going to vote in the 2017 Term, you could have placed your bets with 86% accuracy by observing just one statistic from oral argument—how many times Gorsuch interrupted each side. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 6:36 am
” At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag parse polite and formal language in Supreme Court oral arguments. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 4:20 am
” At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag analyze the “clarifying” reargument in Knick v. [read post]
