Search for: "Tookes v. Harris*"
Results 41 - 60
of 217
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm
Perhaps it took place earlier; it seemed to be a tactic when I first started to try cases. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:15 am
However, in any event, Rose J also took into consideration that it would neither be contrary to the public interest nor harmful to the integrity of the legal system to allow the claim to proceed (following the test for illegality set out in Patel v Mirza [2016] UKSC 42): The purpose of the prohibition on breach of fiduciary duty is to protect companies from becoming the victim of the wrongful exercise of power by their officers. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 10:34 am
From Simeone v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 2:50 pm
Since 1789, the Senate has confirmed 128 nominations to the Supreme Court, but seven successful nominees never took an oath of office to serve on the bench, including some very noteworthy names. [read post]
6 May 2016, 2:18 pm
Supreme Court decided in Hurst v. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 9:14 am
Charles Tower, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
Henry v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 3:51 am
After Meregildo was arrested, Colon took over some of the narcotics operations, supplying crack cocaine to members of CAC as well as to its customers. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 10:06 am
She described a time when defendant took her to the teachers' lounge. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 3:30 pm
In People v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:20 am
Baker, Sr., decided that he would sue the City of Elmira when he was not selected for promotion to fire lieutenant for what he alleged were partisan political reasons.Baker, an Elmira firefighter since 1974, took and passed the promotion test for fire lieutenant. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:45 am
Premo v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 5:00 am
It’s mostly Potter Stewart’s definition of obscenity from his concurrence in Jacobellis v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 5:34 am
Whether I was talking crap to Jose Canseco, you know, I mean, everything on there I kind of looked at it as kind of a joke, and I just took it way too far. [read post]
13 May 2015, 5:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 7:50 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 8:00 am
O’Donnell v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:54 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am
Applying in Bah v UK (2012) 54 EHRR 21 he held that the discrimination was justified on the facts of HC’s case. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:11 pm
Many of you may recall what happened the last time the Supreme Court found that the Board lacked a proper quorum, in New Process Steel v. [read post]
