Search for: "Tooley v. Rose"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2023, 8:33 am
” Thus, if Titanic’s “Jack” disseminated his pencil drawing of “Rose” without her consent and for malicious purposes, this action would violate Virginia’s revenge porn statute — even if (and maybe especially if) Rose never sat for the drawing and the nudity was a function of the artists’ brush/pencil. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 8:33 am
” Thus, if Titanic’s “Jack” disseminated his pencil drawing of “Rose” without her consent and for malicious purposes, this action would violate Virginia’s revenge porn statute – even if (and maybe especially if) Rose never sat for the drawing and the nudity was a function of the artists’ brush/pencil. [read post]
