Search for: "Topps, Inc"
Results 41 - 60
of 68
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2008, 8:07 pm
In the June 2007 Delaware Chancery Court decision concerning the sale of the baseball card maker Topps Company, Inc., the Court noted that in light of a failed auction attempt two years earlier there was no need for the company to conduct an auction when it decided to sell itself. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 9:43 am
Topp Telecom, Inc., 247 F.3d 1316 (Fed. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 2:59 am
"A warning letter on July 2 was sent to Waukon, IA's Regancrest Holsteins Inc. over alleged misuse of multiple animal drugs. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 10:01 am
This includes SANTA CLAUS for Trading Cards owned by The Topps Company, Inc.; SANTA CLAUS for an online retail store services featuring computer hardware and software, toys, games and apparel and a web site featuring the dissemination of advertising for others; HELLO SANTA for toy telephones designed to simulate calls to Santa Clause in the North pole; SANTA'S WORKSHOP for charitable fund raising consulting services; and SANTA CLAUSE IS COMIN’ TO TOWN for a variety… [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:07 pm
Rooftop Owners, or Chicago National League Ball Club, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:12 pm
Topps Chewing Gum, Inc., 202 F.2d 866, 868 (2d Cir. 1953) [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:17 pm
Topp Telecom, Inc., 247 F.3d 1316, 1327 (Fed. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 10:44 pm
Topp Telecom, Inc., 247 F.3d 1316, 1330 (Fed. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 2:59 am
According to CDC, 40 cases of E. coli O157:H7 infection were identified with PFGE patterns that matched at least one of the patterns of E. coli strains found in Topp's brand frozen ground beef patties. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 12:30 am
Furthermore, the fact that the relevant public may have recognized the contested three-dimensional EUTM by referring to another mark which designated the same goods and was used in conjunction with the contested mark did not mean that that mark was not used as a means of identification in itself.Since the mark in question possessed an average distinctive character (the shape of a baby’s bottle for goods such as sugar confectionery and candy), it was held that the figurative and word elements… [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 8:02 am
Topps Chewing Gum, 202 F2d 866 (2d Cir. 1953).) [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
Topp Telecom, lnc., 247 F.3d 1316, 1326 (Fed. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 5:37 pm
" Topps v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 4:58 pm
In 2007 shareholder litigation over a leveraged buyout involving The Topps Company, Inc., he basically told New York state court judge Herbert Cahn to keep his mitts off this dispute when different shareholder groups filed challenges to the deal in New York and Delaware. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
(ISinIP) CAFC grants en banc request to challenge written description requirement: Ariad v Lilly (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patent Docs) (Holman's Biotech IP Blog) Supreme Court asked to yank obviousness from the purview of juries: Medela AG v Kinetic Concepts, Inc (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) All you need to know about Bilski in a 30 min podcast - debate between Prof M Risch and Prof J Sarnoff (IP Think Tank) (Patent Baristas)… [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 12:13 pm
When Cargill Inc. recalled 840,000 pounds of beef patties the following month, it brought more lawsuits by Marler. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:34 am
Topps Chewing Gum, Inc. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:34 am
Topps Chewing Gum, Inc. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
Although the doctrine generally has fallen out of favor in the ensuing decades (see former Justice Herman Cahn's highly informative discussion of the issue in Matter of Topps Co., Inc. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 1:58 pm
Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
