Search for: "Torres v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 839
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2018, 1:19 pm
Torre Jessup, No. 1:18-cv-00467 (M.D.N.C. [read post]
31 May 2018, 10:58 am
” See Torres v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 4:18 am
” At the Brennan Center for Justice, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy looks at this term’s decision in Jesner v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:30 am
Agency Contact: Ana Torres-Davis, Attorney Advisor, National Council on Disability, 1331 F Street, NW, Suite 850, Washington, DC 20004, telephone (202) 272-2019, e-mail: atorresdavis@ncd.gov. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
The case, Trump v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 9:00 pm
The authors wrote, “The maximum observed log reduction of L. monocytogenes was 2.15 ± 0.04 for balsamic vinegar (50% (v/v)), 1.18 ± 0.06 for white wine vinegar ((50% (v/v)) and 1.13 ± 0.06 for acetic acid ((50% (v/v)). [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 6:48 am
Torres v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 6:20 am
Goldman, Sachs & Co., March 30, 2018, Torres, A.). [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 1:16 pm
Gunning[Affirmed; Biles; August 24, 2018]Improper denial of downward durational departure (hard-25)State v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
In Alden v Maine, 527 US 706, the Supreme Court of the United States found that State sovereign immunity is "implicit in the constitutional design. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 6:53 pm
Ventura, Prosecutor v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 3:45 pm
See Manning v. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 4:35 am
” For the American Bar Association’s Human Rights Magazine, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy laments that if the court rules in Jesner v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 1:09 pm
Nuestro Tribunal Supremo en Umpierre v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 1:46 pm
Brainchild: Loving v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:49 am
En cuanto al mandato constitucional sobre fianza no excesiva, el informe positivo puntualiza e intenta adoptar lo resuelto en Hodgdon v United States, 365 F. 2d 679 (1966), que es un caso del Octavo Circuito que establece que una fianza no es inconstitucional sólo porque el imputado no puede prestarla por razón de falta de recursos. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 12:09 pm
We see that in this case.The case is Torres v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 10:11 am
Erick Kolthoff Caraballo explicó que la decisión en Menna había sido restringida en United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:20 am
Stated otherwise, a plaintiff may not assert a claim that is entirely based on the expert’s prior testimony — and nothing more — but may assert a claim that is viable apart from, but supported by, that testimony (see De Lourdes Torres v Jones, 26 NY3d at 770 [precluding the subjection of a witness to potential liability for prior testimony [*3]”alone”]). [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
Senayda Norabuena, et al. v. [read post]
