Search for: "Torres v. U.s.*"
Results 81 - 100
of 133
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2011, 9:52 am
United States (10-6117) (both of which had been relisted three times), which presented the question whether Almendarez-Torres v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 6:49 am
” Torres v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 8:35 am
However, while the circuit courts are rubber stamping dismissals on Almendarez-Torres, commentators are wondering whether the Court is ready to reconsider.U.S. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
" Torres v. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:37 am
” He explained that although, pursuant to the Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 8:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 7:12 pm
Torres, 751 F.2d 875, 880 (7th Cir.1984). 2. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 10:22 pm
Finally, some argue that Smith v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:25 am
Bank of Boston v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 11:25 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, October 01, 2009 US v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 12:41 pm
” Bose, slip op. at 3 (quoting Torres v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 11:52 am
U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, April 02, 2009 Andrew v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 8:21 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 7:29 am
In Torres v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, November 13, 2008 Torres v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
Supreme Court, October 14, 2008 Moore v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 8:46 pm
The Court of Appeals reversed.The issue before the Court was whether the officers had the right to stop Torres' vehicle pursuant to Terry v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Torres, No. 072331 Sentence of 188 to 235 months for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the court did not abuse its discretion in counting both the state drug offense and the state gun offense as contributing to defendant's status as a career offender; 2) the district court was correct in finding the state gun conviction to be a "crime of violence" for career-offender purposes; and 3) district court was compelled to assign defendant,… [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 6:53 pm
US v. [read post]
