Search for: "Torres v. U.s.*"
Results 101 - 120
of 133
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2010, 10:22 pm
Finally, some argue that Smith v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 8:48 am
And Torres-Alfaro v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:28 am
Trust Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
Kobach v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016) I will be teaching a course on Corporate Social Responsibility. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:10 pm
U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, August 26, 2008 Torres v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Santoyo-Torres, No. 07-2204 A conviction for possessing methamphetamine with intent to d [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 8:28 am
Because the employer provided no advance notice to affected employees, but only an explanation after the mass layoff occurred, the unforeseeable business circumstances exception did not apply (Torres v Niche, Inc, December 18, 2013, Stearns, R). [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 8:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
Wallace v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 12:41 pm
” Bose, slip op. at 3 (quoting Torres v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 5:40 am
Plan, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 6:06 am
See United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:02 am
And in United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, November 13, 2008 Torres v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 2:43 pm
" U.S. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, August 21, 2008 US v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Torres, No. 072331 Sentence of 188 to 235 months for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the court did not abuse its discretion in counting both the state drug offense and the state gun offense as contributing to defendant's status as a career offender; 2) the district court was correct in finding the state gun conviction to be a "crime of violence" for career-offender purposes; and 3) district court was compelled to assign defendant,… [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, May 07, 2008 US v. [read post]
