Search for: "Tot v. United States"
Results 21 - 35
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Fung (IPblog) US Copyright – Decisions Court of Appeal for the 5th Circuit: You can't claim ‘innocence’ of musical copyrights: Maverick Recording Company v Whitney Harper (Ars Technica) District Court Massachusetts: Tenenbaum and Nesson ordered to pay labels’ fees over discovery dispute; court finds ‘no extenuating circumstances’: Sony BMG v Tenenbaum (Copyright & Campaigns) (Ars Technics) District Court N D California: Dancing… [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Fung (IPblog) US Copyright – Decisions Court of Appeal for the 5th Circuit: You can't claim ‘innocence’ of musical copyrights: Maverick Recording Company v Whitney Harper (Ars Technica) District Court Massachusetts: Tenenbaum and Nesson ordered to pay labels’ fees over discovery dispute; court finds ‘no extenuating circumstances’: Sony BMG v Tenenbaum (Copyright & Campaigns) (Ars Technics) District Court N D California: Dancing… [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:45 am
The District Court believed that 'overall control' was decisive, and that the United Nations had such control at all relevant times. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 11:35 am
Wiley won the case with the Second Circuit ruling that the first sale doctrine only applies to goods manufactured in the United States. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:36 am
United Kingdom (ECtHR 18 January 2011),European Human Rights Cases (ECHR) 2011/5, 781-806). [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 12:48 pm
6174173 RESTORE 6174113 THREE LITTLE TOTS NICU MILESTONE CARDS 6174091 WHIMSIES 6173888 6173886 6173885 6173884 6173883 6173882 6173880 6173879 SPUR 6173877 SPUR 6173876 COUNTERSTRIKE TABLE TENNIS 6173614 RACK HUB 6173409 ROTTGANG 6173375 MOCCASIN WATER 6176678 MIDNIGHT BLACK 6176608 MARINE MAXX 6176602 OMNIPRO 6172986 NEPTUNE 6172985 KONG COOLERS 6172945 EASTERN EXPRESS INC. 6176433 TREKROLL 6176389 BUSHWHACKER RV 6176350 BRAHMA 6176256 JENNY’S PENNIES 6176218… [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 4:27 am
The Court’s decision last Term in Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:54 pm
United States, 395 U.S. 6, 33, 89 S.Ct. 1532, 1546, 23 L.Ed.2d 57; Tot v. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 3:50 am
My own inclination is toward the global and away from the edifices of the law state system and its international public law based architecture (e.g., Backer, Larry Catá, On the Evolution of the United Nations’ 'Protect-Respect-Remedy' Project: The State, the Corporation and Human Rights in a Global Governance Context (June 3, 2010). [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:47 am
Some clues as to the ITC's rationale were previously provided by the parties' submissions to the United States Trade Representative (USTR).Now it's time for the complete picture. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 2:16 pm
Although the medical value of marijuana has been proven, marijuana is considered a Schedule I drug, which include hallucinogens and narcotics that are frequently abused and have no acceptable medical value for treatment in the United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm
Notably, Romer and Romer’s study was completed with U.S. federal income tax data, not state level data. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 6:33 pm
But that provides a weapon to the great enemy of the Cuban state--the Americans. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 6:45 am
In Maryland, hotel operators convinced the state legislature to pass laws which apply to HMAs that attempt to circumvent the above judicial decisions. [read post]
