Search for: "Totten v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2009, 5:19 am
I decided to bolster the section of my Contracts course devoted to public policy issues by introducing students to the Totten doctrine and the states secrets privilege, which we will discuss without reading any cases. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 5:50 am
As previously discussed on the blog, the Totten doctrine requires dismissal of a case when "the very subject-matter" of the case is a state secret. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 6:15 pm
Beane v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 3:47 pm
Totten, Quieting Disruption: The Mistake of Curtailing Public Employees? [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 3:16 pm
One is that the Supreme Court’s 1875 decision in Totten v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 6:50 pm
Three accounts were in trust for his daughter E, two for her children, V and P, one for his nephew J and one for his niece MY. [read post]
13 Jun 2006, 8:06 am
This would be the case where the cause of action (e.g. a contract) is itself a state secret (as in Totten v. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 6:42 am
” The irrevocable trust stated that the decedent was “specifically disinheriting Peter Schmidt and his descendants. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 10:01 am
Totten v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 11:50 am
The Supreme Court has only affirmed outright dismissal in cases where an American spy is suing the government over a contract claim (Totten v US (1865) and Tenet v Doe (2005)). [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 7:13 am
A recent published appellate opinion addressed the sufficiency of a will to negate a right of survivorship for a joint brokerage account.Placencia v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 3:07 pm
Such a situation recently reached the United States Supreme Court in a case entitled Hillman v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 2:39 pm
The leading case on the other side of the divide is Totten v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 9:08 pm
See Sterling v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 12:58 am
Totten v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 10:18 am
As Oregon acknowledges that “[t]he primary and governing rule of the construction of insurance contracts is to ascertain the intention of the parties,” Totten v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 4:00 am
Wilson, et al., v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:09 am
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 5:25 pm
It is like other non-jurisdictional, nonmerits "threshhold grounds" that the Court has allowed district courts to decide before jurisdiction (e.g., Younger abstention, Totten doctrine, discretionary adjudication of state-law claims). [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 9:28 am
Ventura County District Attorney Gregory Totten, prior to the announcement of the Johnson decision, requested the Attorney General’s opinion on two questions: Does Penal Code section 832.7, subdivision (a), authorize a district attorney, for the purpose of complying with the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Brady v. [read post]
