Search for: "Totten v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 41
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2022, 6:42 am
” The irrevocable trust stated that the decedent was “specifically disinheriting Peter Schmidt and his descendants. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 7:05 am
Totten v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
Totten v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 7:13 am
A recent published appellate opinion addressed the sufficiency of a will to negate a right of survivorship for a joint brokerage account.Placencia v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 7:13 am
A recent published appellate opinion addressed the sufficiency of a will to negate a right of survivorship for a joint brokerage account.Placencia v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 9:08 am
The California Court of Appeal for the Second District said no in O.G. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:09 am
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 5:11 pm
One may ratify assumptions of power, extinguish debts, wipe out wrongs, and confirm rights, by the directions of one's will (Bizzey v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 6:22 am
The issue before the Court in the Estate of Konstantinos Boulis v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 9:28 am
Ventura County District Attorney Gregory Totten, prior to the announcement of the Johnson decision, requested the Attorney General’s opinion on two questions: Does Penal Code section 832.7, subdivision (a), authorize a district attorney, for the purpose of complying with the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Brady v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 6:50 pm
Three accounts were in trust for his daughter E, two for her children, V and P, one for his nephew J and one for his niece MY. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 9:10 pm
Donald V. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 3:07 pm
Such a situation recently reached the United States Supreme Court in a case entitled Hillman v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:30 pm
The Court set the tone for its robust judicial review of the executive branch in one of the first of these cases, Hamdi v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 6:20 am
Totten v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:40 pm
Under the long-standing doctrine of Totten v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 6:15 pm
Beane v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 2:03 pm
See Totten v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 12:09 pm
(a) The opinion states that some of the claims might well fall under the Totten bar, particularly those requiring proof of an agreement between Jeppesen and the CIA. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 10:18 am
As Oregon acknowledges that “[t]he primary and governing rule of the construction of insurance contracts is to ascertain the intention of the parties,” Totten v. [read post]
