Search for: "Tower Insurance Company v Allstate Insurance Company" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2009, 7:35 am
[c]onclusory statements by insurance company employees . . . are insufficient to establish materiality as a matter of law" (Parmar v Hermitage Ins. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 9:46 am
 Consistent with this construction, “[t]he standard for determining residency for insurance coverage ‘requires something more than temporary or physical presence and. . . at least some degree of permanence and intention to remain’” Allstate Insurance Co., v Rupp, 7 AD3d 302 (lst Dept. 2004) (citing Government Empls. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
If the insurer wishes its investigation to include an inspection of the damaged or destroyed property, the inspection, whether performed by the insurer, an independent adjuster, or other representative of the insurer, must occur within the time frames specified in this paragraph. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
If the insurer wishes its investigation to include an inspection of the damaged or destroyed property, the inspection, whether performed by the insurer, an independent adjuster, or other representative of the insurer, must occur within the time frames specified in this paragraph. [read post]