Search for: "Toy v. District of Columbia" Results 1 - 20 of 37
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2008, 9:11 am
BEHDAD, INC. et al District of Columbia District Court Filed: March 4, 2008 Plaintiff: LIFTED RESEARCH GROUP, INC. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 8:15 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In 1996, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California ruled in Daniel J. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 5:30 am by Joy
Here are our leading legal headlines for the week of March 27, 2023 from Wise Law on Twitter:How Donald Trump Would Be ArrestedNordstrom Canada gets court permission to launch sales at its closing storesTrump’s Georgia Lawyers Seek to Quash Special Grand Jury ReportCloud computing services not subject to PST says BC court: Hootsuite Inc. v British Columbia (Finance)Ontario woman faces over 30 charges in rental fraud investigation on Facebook Marketplace, KijijiSix Oath… [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 3:19 am
" "I ♥ DC" means "I love D.C., the District of Columbia. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 4:48 am
" This is prohibited, however, by "the District of Columbia's 31-year-old prohibition on the ownership of handguns". [read post]
4 May 2010, 9:57 pm by MacIsaac
Grand & Toy Alberta Ltd., , [1978] 2 S.C.R. 229, 83 D.L.R. (3d) 452, Arnold v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:29 pm by Thomas James
This was an APA proceeding initiated in the federal district court of the District of Columbia for review of the United State Copyright Office’s refusal to register a copyright in an AI-generated work. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:43 pm by Marie Louise
Verizon (EDTexweblog.com) District Court Columbia: Bilski applied to invalidate computer system claims: CLS Bank Int’l v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 5:29 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The District of Columbia statute gave the Juvenile Court Exclusive jurisdiction over a youth accused of a crime. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 4:37 am
(IP Litigation Blog) District Court E D Virginia: Stay pending reexam denied because a stay would result in ‘more significant’ prejudice given the Court’s overall speed in disposing patent cases: Telecommunication Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EPO: Should green technology be subject to compulsory licensing? [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am by Kelly
Buzz Bee Toys Inc (IPBiz) Leviton Manufacturing – ALJ Bullock grants motions to terminate investigation in Ground Fault Circuit Interrupters (337-TA-739) based on settlement (ITC Law Blog) MGM Well Services – Patent case transferred to Southern District of Texas: MGM Well Services, Inc. v. [read post]