Search for: "Toyota v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 226
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2013, 8:51 am
In 2005, the United States Congress enacted the Graves Amendment. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:58 am
Supreme Court in connection with Morrison v. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 6:56 pm
United Airlines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999), and Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:07 pm
Most of the affected limos and hearses are in the United States, with the remainder being in Canada. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
Importantly, the Court’s discussion of the source-identifying function of trademarks, repeated emphasis on source confusion as the principal harm in trademark law (see, e.g., the type of confusion “most commonly in trademark law’s sights”, “the bête noire of trademark law”, and the “cardinal sin under the law”), and discussion of the United We Stand America opinion suggests the Justices may like Rogers’ focus on preventing uses… [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 1:58 am
Supreme Court decision in Morrison v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 12:46 am
The Supreme Court’s decision last month in the Morrison v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 11:30 am
"The bill also would override the Court's unanimous ruling in Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 6:01 am
Supreme Court’s holdings in Sutton v United Air Lines, Inc. and Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v Williams, the Iowa Supreme Court majority explained that it did not agree with the employee’s contention that the 2008 amendments required it to interpret the state law to include the disorder. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 1:03 pm
AND VISCOUNT PROPERTIES II, L.P., D/B/A HOY FOX TOYOTA/LEXUS, No. 10-0933 Opinion of the Court Concurring The Court held that, when a trial court grants a motion for new trial, its stated reasons can be substantively challenged through a mandamus action to see whether they fit with the record. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
Toyota suffers setback in trademark battle before the Delhi High Court: Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
(TTABlog) Monarch Casino & Resort - Trademark battle over the fame of ATLANTIS for casino services headed to trial in Nevada District Court: Kerzner International Inc v Monarch Casino & Resort Inc (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) Soccer United Marketing – SUM and Major League Soccer sue of Black & Decker over ‘ambush marketing’ (Trademark Blog) [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 5:46 pm
Moreover, Hayes Lemmerz has 4.86 retirees receiving health insurance benefits for every active worker in the United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
BSN Medical Limited and BSN Medical GmbH (EPLAW) United States US General Year ahead: Range of IP policy issues may see action in United States in 2010 (IP Watch) Conan O’Brien wants to keep his IP (Daily Dose of IP) Invent Help sues patent blogger, Gene Quinn (The Invent Blog) US Patents Director Kappos on USPTO’s (lack of) funding (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (IAM) When the examination process goes south (Peter Zura's 271 Patent… [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 2:10 am
French legislators have second thoughts on three strikes law (ArsTechnica) Russia BitTorrent admins charged in $1.25bn movie piracy case (TorrentFreak) Spain Music industry threatens OpenBitTorrent’s new hosting provider (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom BT and TalkTalk take on the Digital Economy Act (1709 Blog) Yet more lawyers jump on turn piracy into profit bandwagon (TorrentFreak) PRS wants ISPs to pay for pirating customers (TorrentFreak) United States US Patents… [read post]
22 May 2009, 9:20 am
United States, No. 07-40861 (5th Cir. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 5:49 am
The IPKat is really disappointed that this action is being brought in the United States and not in Europe following last month's Intel v CPM ruling (see IPKat here and here), where counsel on both sides could indulge in endless argument as to the state of mind of the relevant consumer, the likelihood of confusion and the extent to which the use of the mark on the t-shirt might be expected to affect the economic activity of consumers of the claimant's… [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:42 am
Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 5:54 am
A few years later, in Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. [read post]
