Search for: "Transit Commission v. United States"
Results 381 - 400
of 575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
Channel 4 has announced that it has commissioned a Docu-drama of the case. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:38 am
April 10, 2019: Repack Transition Progress Report – All full-power and Class A television stations repacked as a result of the incentive auction, other than those in Phase 1 or Phase 2 that have completed the repacking process, including filing reports of completion, must file a report in the Licensing and Management System (LMS) to detail their progress toward completion of the transition. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:26 am
United States On 24 August Reuters had an article “Sarah Palin can sue New York Times for defamation – court ruling”. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:29 am
The Status of Religious Arbitration in the United States and Canada Nicholas Walter Abstract: This paper discusses, and challenges, the status of religious arbitration in the United States and Canada. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 4:06 pm
United StatesJones v. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 10:12 am
(d) Guidelines by Attorney General Not later than one year after August 23, 1988, the Attorney General, after consultation with the Commission, the Secretary of Commerce, the United States Trade Representative, the Secretary of State, and the Secretary of the Treasury, and after obtaining the views of all interested persons through public notice and comment procedures, shall determine to what extent compliance with this section would be enhanced and the… [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 3:34 pm
The Final Rules state that the Pay Versus Performance Disclosure will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under either the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) except to the extent that the issuer affirmatively does incorporate it by reference. [read post]
20 Feb 2021, 1:26 pm
Matal v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(IP finance) Software patents at the UK IPO (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) United States US General Open letter to Obama: Uncle Sam should go open source (Ars Technica) EFF relaunches legal guide for bloggers (EFF) US General – Lawsuits and strategic steps Facebook – Facebook, UConnect trade secrets settlement deal worth $65 million according to Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges (Law360) US Patents –… [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 3:08 am
He mainly draws on American law and examples of street art from the United States while intertwining international examples, laws, and cases. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 3:01 pm
Study on the impact of State Blue Sky laws on Regulation A offerings.TITLE V--PRIVATE COMPANY FLEXIBILITY AND GROWTHSec. 501. [read post]
25 May 2023, 6:18 am
The pressure on the EU Commission to approve the EU/US Data Protection Framework adequacy decision is now greater than ever. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm
United States On 31 January 2022, the EARN IT Act was reintroduced to the Senate by Senator Richard Blumenthal and 18 co-sponsors from both parties. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:05 pm
On Wednesday 26 March 2014, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Wilson, Sumption, Carnwath and Toulson) gave judgment in the case of Kennedy v Charity Commission ([2014] UKSC 20). [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:34 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:22 am
However, last year, in an abrupt reversal, the United States Supreme Court dramatically limited the extraterritorial application of U.S. securities laws in Morrison v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
The Commission’s reversion order did not interfere with the plaintiff’s reasonable investment backed expectations at the time of acquisition because the plaintiff had committed to build 385 housing units and had failed to complete them. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 2:15 am
But in this connection, let us turn to the case of Hirst v United Kingdom No2 (the prisoner voting case). [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
The Commission’s reversion order did not interfere with the plaintiff’s reasonable investment backed expectations at the time of acquisition because the plaintiff had committed to build 385 housing units and had failed to complete them. [read post]
