Search for: "Transport Acceptance Corp. v. Interstate Contract Carriers Corp"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2010, 12:11 pm
Yellow Cab Co., 332 U.S. 218, 67 S.Ct. 1560, 91 L.Ed. 2010 (1947), overruled on other grounds by Copperweld Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:29 am
When none arrived, she accepted the offer of a retainer by a recently created holding company, Aviation Corporation (AVCO), assembled from scores of small carriers by two great New York investment banks. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
§ 14501(c)(1), which provides that “a State [or] political subdivision . . . may not enact or enforce a law, regulation, or other provision having the force and effect of law related to a price, route, or service of any motor carrier . . . with respect to the transportation of property,” contains an unexpressed “market participant” exception and permits a municipal governmental entity to take action that conflicts with the express preemption clause,… [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 6:05 am
Contract Carrier Company that transports freight under contract with one or a limited number of shippers. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 9:12 pm
The Employer provides aviation-related shuttle transportation services for an undisputed Railway Labor Act carrier and the Board found, in accord with the National Mediation Board's decision (35 NMB 201), that it is covered under the Railway Labor Act. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:41 am
BROWARD COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, Defendant-Appellant. 11th Circuit.Labor relations -- Fair Labor Standards Act -- Overtime -- Motor carrier exemption -- Shuttle service that provides ground transportation services to general public traveling to and from local airports was entitled to summary judgment on former shuttle driver's claim for overtime under Fair Labor Standards Act on ground that airport shuttle van drivers fall under motor carrier exemption to FLSA… [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
The pair concerns whether the federal government has the power effectively to override a state governor’s decision not to allow a requested state-prisoner custody transfer under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
