Search for: "Trapp, Appeal of" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Canada The Court of Appeal for British Columbia dismissed the defendants’ appeal and allowed the plaintiff’s appeal, in part, in the case of Rooney v Galloway 2024 BCCA 8. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 7:01 am by Maksym Vishchyk
The underlying logic is that full-scale CTL application may otherwise be used to prosecute conflict-related conduct covered by the combatant’s immunity, thus creating normative conflicts (Trapp (2014) 170). [read post]
16 May 2022, 8:51 am by privacylawyer
The court disagreed, quoting from a Saskatchewan Court of Appeal decision from 2011 called Trapp: “To label information of this kind as mere “subscriber information” or “customer information”, or nothing but “name, address, and telephone number information”, tends to obscure its true nature. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 7:11 am by Bethany Berger
Trapp, which involved state taxes, the Supreme Court held that although in the ordinary case “tax exemptions are strictly construed, … in the government’s dealings with the Indians the rule is exactly the contrary. [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 12:29 am by Lasse Søndergaard Christensen
Lasse Søndergaard ChristensenOn the 21 March 2018 the Danish Board of Appeal (“The Board”) delivered its decision regarding the trademark protection of the shape of the following potato snack (decision no. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 3:36 am
 Recalling his earlier Opinion in Hauck[the Tripp Trapp chair case], the AG highlighted that in assessing the ground in Article 3(1)(e)(iii) of the 2008 directive, “account must be taken both of the perception of the sign at issue by the relevant public and the economic effects which will result from reserving that sign to a single undertaking. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:52 am
During his examination, Detective Melton retrieved a Facebook profile under the name `Bandman Trapp. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 12:33 pm by Patricia Salkin
This appeal arose from the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County’s entry of a declaratory judgment in favor of appellee, Anne Arundel County, as to all counts and claims stated in a class action complaint filed against it by appellants, William Dabbs, Sally Trapp, Samuel Craycraft, and Roberta Craycraft, “individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 8:25 am by admin
Kovacic, Professor, King’s College London | Non-Executive Director, Competition and Markets Authority, London; Thomas Kramler, Head of Sector, Task Force Digital Single Market, DG COMP, Brussels; Valérie Meunier, Vice President, Compass Lexecon, Paris; Andreas Mundt, President, Bundeskartellamt, Bonn / Chairman, ICN; Renato Nazzini, Professor, King’s College London; Damien Neven, Professor of Economics, The Graduate Institute, Geneva | Senior… [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 1:13 am
No "mix and match" of the functionality objectionsThe CJEU confirmed that its earlier Hauck decision (regarding the Tripp-Trapp chair, C-205/13) had effectively already answered Arnold J's Question 2. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 1:02 pm
.* Letter from Japan 3: Copyright and industrial design: trapped in the Tripp Trapp ...Here's the third in the series of occasional guest posts from Japan from one-time guest Kat and Class 46 trade mark blogger Laetitia Lagarde. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 8:20 am
The slogan “The chair that grows with the child” has been used in the marketing of the Tripp Trapp chair since the 1980s. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
Its relevance and meaning has been central to the dispute between the parties, to significant parts of Arnold J's judgment and also to the underlying registry decision he was considering on appeal. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
Supreme Court dismisses appeal in Servier v Apotex. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:03 am
The referring court rejected Hauck's appeal, but considered that the cross-appeal on the issue of registrability of the trade mark called for the interpretation of Article 3(1)(e) of the directive which, to date, has not been covered by the CJEU's case-law. [read post]