Search for: "Travel Marketing Service, Inc., Appeal of"
Results 21 - 40
of 259
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2013, 9:54 am
Mortgage Market, Inc. , 9 F. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 10:50 pm
Resort Option Enterprises, Inc., Oppositions Nos. 91174767 and 91174768 [Section 2(d) opposition to registration of the mark PANDA TRAVEL in standard character and design form for "travel agency services, namely making reservations and bookings for transportation" [TRAVEL disclaimed] based upon alleged prior use of the mark PANDA TRAVEL for "travel agency services"].September 15, 2009 - 11 AM: In re Apollo… [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 1:13 am
Jin Lee BRONX COUNTYConsumer ProtectionDHR'S Investigation of H&R Block's Marketing Practices Not Federally Preempted by Banking LawH&R Block Tax Services Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 1:31 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUIT Government $6,700 Fine for Violating Iraqi Sanctions Act Stands; All Travel Transactions Are Not Exempt Karpova v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 5:32 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITGovernment$6,700 Fine for Violating Iraqi Sanctions Act Stands; All Travel Transactions Are Not Exempt Karpova v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 9:27 pm
Vail Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 4:18 am
Sandoz Inc. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 9:24 am
The decision is the Court of Appeals 10/31/06 ruling in Flying J., Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 8:36 am
Seacrets, Inc., 2012 WL 1282382 (D. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 5:34 am
TrinityWorldwide Services Inc.), 2011 ONSC 4808; Campeau v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 8:32 am
Real Action Paintball, Inc. (7th Cir. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 1:39 pm
V., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 8:36 am
Tri-Serve provides PEO services to the greater Cincinnati, Ohio market. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:11 pm
Swift Distribution, Inc., No. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 1:21 pm
The trial court (Santa Clara Superior, Judge Jack Komar) granted the employer's motion for summary judgment, and the employee appealed. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 5:18 am
The judge then outlines the facts in the FTC’s original suit against Ross and explains how they tie into the relevant law: The [FTC] sued Innovative Marketing, Inc. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
FLOWERS, INC., et al., Debtors. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:18 am
Applicant appealed. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 6:49 am
Uber Technologies Inc. et al. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:11 am
Trancos, Inc., 2012 WL 593703 (Ca. [read post]
