Search for: "Travelers Casualty & Surety Co of America" Results 21 - 40 of 46
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2013, 1:27 pm by Sarah Swan
  It's not even clear who is actually on the hook to pay the monies: the only known insurers, Travelers Casualty and Surety Co. of America, issued a statement indicating that they were "not a party to the settlement," and that it "would have been with other insurers of the homeowners association and/or the property managers." [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 6:43 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Contract Law Opinions Body: AC34559 - Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
—a defunct mortgage broker, she filed a second amended class-action complaint and added as defendants, Hartford Fire Insurance Co., Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, and the Ohio Superintendent of Financial Institutions. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:28 am by Christopher G. Hill
Travelers Casualty and Surety Co. of America, et. al. held that, despite language in the General Contractor’s contract allowing set-off for obligations based upon “any other contract or agreement,” Miller Act claims are not subject to setoff based on non federal projects. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 4:15 am by Maxwell Kennerly
The complaints assert that conspiring brokers funneled unwitting clients to their co-conspirator insurers, which were insulated from competition; in return, the insurers awarded the brokers contingent commission payments—concealed from the insurance purchasers and surreptitiously priced into insurance premiums—based on the volume of premium dollars steered their way. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 3:00 am by Chip Merlin
See Dadeland Depot, Inc., supra; Bullard Building Condominium Association, Inc. v Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America, 2009 U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 2:00 am
Travelers Casualty and Surety Co. of America, et. al. held that, despite language in the General Contractor's contract allowing setoff for obligations based upon "any other contract or agreement," Miller Act claims are not subject to setoff based on non federal projects. [read post]