Search for: "Travelers Insurance Company v. Hill" Results 1 - 20 of 63
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2010, 9:52 am by Steven M. Gursten
Personal injury attorney exposes insurance companies threats and scare tactics - and huge profits - following McCormick v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 8:05 am by Daniel E. Cummins
On December 31, 2014, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court granted Travelers' Insurance Company’s Petition for Allowance of Appeal in the first party benefits peer review case of Doctor’s Choice Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Center, P.C. [read post]
9 Sep 2007, 7:54 am
An Insurance Company That Had Not Provided Notice to the Insured Could Not Rely Upon an Unusually Broad Interpretation of an Exclusion ClauseEssex Insurance Company v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 7:31 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The Texas Supreme Court issued an opinion in June 2011, in the case styled, Lancer Insurance Company v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 2:24 am by Steven M. Gursten
Pioneer State Mutual Insurance Company of Michigan, 273 Mich App 47, 50-55 (2006); see, also, Shiroka v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 5:36 am by Robert Kreisman
The offer to settle the case made by the defendants’ insurance company and the defendants before trial was just $15,000. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 6:16 am by Jeanne Huang
  [1] High Court of Australia decisions such as Akai Pty Ltd v People’s Insurance Co Ltd (1996) 188 CLR 418 at 445, Oceanic Sunline Special Shipping Company Inc v Fay (1988) 165 CLR 197 at 259, Huddart Parker Ltd v The Ship Mill Hill (1950) 81 CLR 502 at 508-509. [read post]