Search for: "Travis v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 260
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2021, 2:40 pm by Eugene Volokh
Here is a summary of the plaintiff's allegations, from Judge Liam O'Grady's opinion denying a motion to dismiss: Plaintiff is a retired Senior Master Sergeant in the United States Air Force ("SMSgt. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
 A federal district court judge in Texas has set the starting trial date for the United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 2:25 am by Amy Howe
United States, involving a “meaty Speech or Debate clause” issue. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
§ 1182(a)(6)(E), which provides that “[a]ny alien who at any time knowingly has encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted, or aided any other alien to enter or to try to enter the United States in violation of law is inadmissible. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 6:18 pm
SUSAN COMBS, SUCCESSOR TO CAROLE KEETON STRAYHORN, COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, AND GREG ABBOTT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TEXAS; from Travis County; 3rd district (03-07-00006-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 03-12-08)08-0327 WOODROW WILSON WILLIAMS v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 10:42 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Their only power -- to seek state punishment for rule violators -- is a regressive function. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
At The Federalist, Travis Barham urges the court to review Uzuegbunam v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 7:36 am by Amy Howe
United States, the justices will return to a familiar statute: the Armed Career Criminal Act, which imposes an enhanced sentence for unlawful possession of a firearm if the defendant has three convictions “committed on occasions different from one another. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:31 am by Steve Hall
If the Travis County court invalidates the change in drugs because state law was not followed, the state would be forced to resort to using the previous drug — which has become unavailable in the United States. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 6:44 am
Supreme court case of Caulder -v- Bull 3 U.S. 386 (1798) which states:"I will state what laws I consider ex post facto laws, within the words and the intent of the prohibition. 1st. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 2:58 pm
Malandra, et. al., United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D.N.Y. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by Kevin LaCroix
   This question was left unanswered for a very long time, until the United States Supreme Court (the “Supreme Court”) resolved it in  Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]