Search for: "Treat v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 23,234
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2018, 5:50 pm
Kendrick v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
McChristian v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 6:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:22 am
(a) By history and tradition the definition and regulation of marriage has been treated as being within the authority and realm of the separate States. [read post]
16 May 2008, 1:59 am
R (Nasseri) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 464; [2008] WLR (D) 150 “The scope of the deeming provision in Sch 3, Pt 2, para 3(2) of the Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants etc) Act 2004, which required states listed in Sch 2, Pt 2, para 2 of the Act to be treated as countries safe for a person to be returned, was limited to the actual process of executive decision or adjudication of whether a person's removal… [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 4:37 pm
United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 3:57 am
., LTD v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 12:28 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States [official website] issued an opinion [text, PDF] on Monday for Howell v. [read post]
10 Oct 2006, 2:07 pm
Thanks SCOTUSBlog for putting up the link to the oral argument transcript in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 2:50 am
United States, 559 F.3d 1228 (Fed. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 2:28 pm
State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:14 pm
As these cases show, the states’ applications of the death penalty have exposed individuals to execution who should have been protected because of their intellectual disability (Moore v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:36 pm
The following are the most important orders given by the Justices Sudershan Reddy and Surinder Singh Nijjar of the Supreme Court in the case of Nandini Sundar v State of Chattisgarh (2011):1. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 1:46 pm
In Washington v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:49 am
Regina (Medical Justice) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 269; [2011] WLR (D) 95 “Where a party sought permission to appeal from a judge and permission was granted on terms, that party had no right to appeal against those terms by reason of section 54(4) of the Access to Justice Act 1999, unless the party concerned was not present at the permission hearing at which the terms were imposed. [read post]
12 May 2009, 4:00 am
"*In Williams v. [read post]
28 Sep 2006, 10:08 am
Hunter v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 11:23 am
The new case, Williams v. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 3:12 am
The Supreme Court heard the appeal in R (Agyarko) v Secretary of State for the Home Department on 6-7 April 2016. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 2:30 am
On appeal from: [2017] EWCA Civ 2028 These appeals raised common issues regarding the scope of the Ruiz Zambrano v Office national de l’emploi (Case C-34/09) [2012] QB 265 (“Zambrano”) principle which states that a non-member state national (“TCN”) parent of a European Union citizen child resident within the EU is entitled to reside in the EU. [read post]
