Search for: "Trippe v. Trippe"
Results 41 - 60
of 107
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2015, 1:13 am
The same happened in the aftermath of the Puffin/Penguin case [United Biscuits v Asda, noted here]. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 3:20 am
[readers may recall that this issue has been recently addressed in Hauck, also known as the Tripp Trapp case and noted here]3) Should Article 3(1)(e)(ii) of [the Trade Marks Directive] be interpreted as precluding registration of shapes which are necessary to obtain a technical result with regard to the manner in which the goods are manufactured as opposed to the manner in which the goods function? [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:49 am
In the present case, since the national court found that the shape of the Tripp Trapp high chair gives substantial value to it within the meaning of the third indent of Article 3(1)(e) of Directive 89/104, and thus as a whole satisfies the requirements for application of that ground, the fact that that shape also provides other characteristics, such as safety and ergonomic requirements, which could additionally be considered from the point of view of the ground contained in the first indent… [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 1:02 pm
The case is Minder Music & Another v Sharples. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 8:20 am
Tripp TrappWith that background, the IP High Court of Japan recently issued a Judgment (Stokke v Katoji, Intellectual Property High Court, April 14, 2015, Hei 26 (ne) No. 10063) which recognized the copyright in an industrial design, namely for the TRIPP TRAPP children’s chair (Stokke has known some IP trials and tribulations for the same chair in Europe, see here). [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
This is what Roland has to say:In June, CJEU Advocate General Wathelet issued his opinion in Nestlé v Cadbury (Case C-215/14 [noted by the IPKat here].The perceived wisdom has since been that Nestlé's Kit Kat shape (left) must necessarily be unregistrable as a trade mark. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 3:46 pm
The petitioners also place reliance upon a report by Special Referee Tripp in Matter of Leahy v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 6:04 am
Tripp, 2010 UT 9, ¶ 23, 227 P.3d 1251 (Utah Supreme Court 2010) Because district courts `have broad discretion in matters of discovery,’ we review for an abuse of discretion the district court's ruling that denied Mr. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 7:44 am
The last case of the March argument session, Bullard v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 4:19 am
Ducheneaux (Ducheneaux), when the Decedent transferred two quarter sections of Indian trust land located in Tripp County, South Dakota, to Ducheneaux. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:30 am
KG v Stokke A/S, in which the dispute centered around children's chairs. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 3:24 am
On the jiplp weblog there's an analysis of the Court of Justice of the European Union's latest "clarification" of European law on the registration of product shapes as trade marks in Hauck v Stokke, the "Tripp Trapp" chair case. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 6:51 am
Neither TRIPS nor the Paris Convention specify the framework within which product shapes are protected, though it seems to be an almost universal phenomenon that national law makes some sort of special provision for them.Annette then took the audience through a sequence of shape-as-trade-mark decisions involving Community trade mark registration: C-371/06 Benetton v G-Star, T-508/08 Bang & Olufsen (illustrated right) and Hauck/Stokke (the TRIPP TRAPP case, discussed… [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 4:24 am
At present, there is no common standard for copyright protection within the EU, so little prospect of pan-European relief for copyright infringement, whereas trade mark law offers far better prospects of such relief,Functionality of protectable subject matter came next, with discussion focusing on the ruling of the Court of Justice ruling in the TRIPP TRAPP case [Case C-205/13 Hauck v Stokke, noted by the IPKat here]. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:55 pm
Trippe Hawthorne Act 759 of 2014 updated and amended a number of aspects of Louisiana’s Public Bid Law, set out at La. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
Supreme Court dismisses appeal in Servier v Apotex. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
* Tripp Trapp and the Third Dimension: a study in trade mark registrability Here’s the much awaited IPKat comment on Case C‑205/13 Hauck GmbH & Co. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 7:24 am
Open Access Issues and Potential Solutions Workshop – McCutcheon, V., Kerridge, S., Meyering, M. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:03 am
KG v Stokke A/S, Stokke Nederland BV, Peter Opsvik and Peter Opsvik A/S was decided on 18 September, but this Kat -- who has been beset by a succession of happy distractions -- has only just got round to writing it up for the weblog. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 8:38 am
On Patinformatics, Anthony Trippe does some investigation of his own. [read post]
