Search for: "Troester v. Starbucks Corp."
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
Starbucks Corp., ___ Cal.5th ___ (July 26, 2018). [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 1:24 pm
In Troester v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 1:24 pm
In Troester v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 7:20 pm
Starbucks Corp., No. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 11:37 am
Starbucks Corp. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 11:36 am
Douglas Troester filed suit alleging that Starbucks violated the California Labor Code by failing to pay him for short periods of time he spent closing the store. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 12:07 pm
In Troester v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 9:22 am
Starbucks Corp., 680 F. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:01 pm
Starbucks Corp., No. [read post]
11 Aug 2018, 6:34 am
Additional Resources: Troester v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 10:30 am
Not long afterward, in Troester v. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 8:41 am
In Troester v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:12 am
The employee’s derivative state-law claims failed as well (Troester v Starbucks Corp, March 7, 2014, Feess, G). [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 6:43 am
Additional Resources: Troester v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 10:56 am
Relying on the intervening California Supreme Court authority in Troester v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 8:55 am
Mgmt & Training Corp., 948 F.3d 1270, 1284 (10th Cir. 2020); Lyons v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
” Troester v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
” Troester v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 9:29 am
” Although the California Supreme Court is considering the de minimis doctrine in Troester v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 9:29 am
” Although the California Supreme Court is considering the de minimis doctrine in Troester v. [read post]
