Search for: "Troxel v. Granville" Results 121 - 140 of 152
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2010, 9:01 pm by J. Benjamin Stevens
Smith, which applied the United States Supreme Court decision in Troxell v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 8:19 am by blacklobellolaw
The United States Supreme Court addressed a grandparent’s right to visitation in the hallmark case Troxel v Granville (530 U.S. 57, 2000). [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:51 am
After a little research, I found that the decision referred to was Troxel v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 12:46 pm by Jimmy Verner
Granville, after which it examines the three Texas Supreme Court cases applying Troxel v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 4:16 am by Robert A. Epstein
Granville and the New Jersey Supreme Court's decision in Moriarty v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 4:50 am
  The US Supreme Court also addressed this issue in the matter of Troxel v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 12:39 pm by Kysa Crusco
Additionally, the United States Supreme Court, in Troxel v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 5:53 pm
In upholding the New York Law which permits grandparents, under certain circumstances, to seek visitation with their grandchildren, the Court distinguished the New York law from the overly broad Washington law struck down by the United States Supreme Court in Troxel v Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000). [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 11:39 am
As Akhil Amar has observed, "[v]irtually no serious modern scholar - left, right, and center - thinks that [Slaughterhouse] is a plausible reading of the Amendment. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:25 pm
Subsequent to the enactment of that statute, the US Supreme Court  in Troxel v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 4:34 am
The presumption that a fit parent's decisions are in the child's best interests is a strong one" (Matter of E.S. v P.D., see also Troxel v Granville,     In the absence of automatic standing based on the death of one of the child's parents, the court must make a threshold determination that the grandparent has "established the right to be heard" (Matter of Emanuel S. v Joseph… [read post]