Search for: "Trump. v. International Refugee Assistance Project"
Results 121 - 130
of 130
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
Acting against the backdrop of the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari in Hawaii’s challenge to the third iteration of President Trump’s travel ban (EO-3), the Fourth Circuit on Thursday by a vote of 9-4 affirmed the injunction in the other travel ban challenge, International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
Acting against the backdrop of the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari in Hawaii’s challenge to the third iteration of President Trump’s travel ban (EO-3), the Fourth Circuit on Thursday by a vote of 9-4 affirmed the injunction in the other travel ban challenge, International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 10:42 am
Kimberley Fletcher is an assistant professor of political science at San Diego State University. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:00 am
The 2014 terrorist attack at the Kunming railway station did not amount to hostilities that might arguably trigger international humanitarian law rather than IHRL, as the attacks were not characterized by sufficient “intensity and organization” under Prosecutor v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:51 pm
Trump versus International Refugee Assistance Project” and “Donald J. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
” Heller is the co-founder of the International Refugee Assistance Project. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
International Refugee Assistance Project, 582 U. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 6:18 am
International Refugee Assistance Project, the executive branch asked the court to stay nationwide injunctions issued by lower courts against President Donald Trump’s travel ban, arguing among other things that nationwide injunctions were an impermissible remedy. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Supreme Court’s statement in Reiter v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 5:22 pm
TRUMP, by the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including sections 212(f) and 215(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1182(f) and 1185(a), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, hereby find that, absent the measures set forth in this proclamation, the immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of persons described in section 2 of this proclamation would be detrimental to the interests of the… [read post]
