Search for: "Tucker v. Government Employees Insurance"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2011, 6:58 am
Something called a premium waiver due to disability.Some group life insurance plans - including many covered by the federal ERISA law that governs employee benefits - have a provision that allows disabled employees to keep their life insurance coverage. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 9:28 am
This would be offered as employer group coverage, and of course, it will be covered by ERISA - the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (the Federal law that governs employee benefits).From my experience with my clients who are receiving Long Term Disability benefits, the more that insurance companies manage disability involves more active claims handling to get people back to work and to avoid paying claims. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 6:00 am
Having a private policy gives piece of mind to an employee that they will still have disability or life insurance, even if their employer goes bankrupt.Copyright (c) 2010 by John V. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 6:00 am
Tucker's lecture focused on the impact of Social Security Benefits on the benefits disabled people receive under private Disability Insurance policies and ERISA Disability benefit plans. 'ERISA' stands for the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, the federal law that governs employer group insurance and pension plans.Many attorneys and disability claimants do not realize that Social Security Disability benefits are often… [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 1:11 pm
It is shorthand for the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, a federal law passed in 1974 that regulates employee benefits for all private employers (those which are not the government or a church).What does ERISA have to do with your Short Term Disability ("STD") or Long Term Disability ("LTD") claim? [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 5:54 am
Copyright (c) 2010 by John V. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 4:12 pm
Copyright (c) 2010 by John V. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:40 am
The case, Tucker v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:21 am
Tucker and Tucker & Ludin, P.A. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:56 am
Co. v Tucker, 273 AD2d 683 [2000]). [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 1:16 pm
Although the government acquiesced in jurisdiction in the district court, the Tucker Act applies, jurisdiction over this case was proper only in the Court of Federal Claims. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 9:36 am
Services, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:19 pm
The only interesting part of the opinion was that the court recognized that the MSP makes no mention, much less any promise, of reimbursement by Medicare for expenses a private insurer alleges are the primary obligation of the federal government. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:47 am
Sebelius, 22 No. 34 Westlaw Journal Insurance Coverage 3, Westlaw Journal Insurance Coverage June 1, 2012 May 21 (Reuters) - The University of Notre Dame and dozens of other Catholic institutions have sued the Obama administration to block a government regulation that requires employers to provide health insurance coverage for contraceptives to employees. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 6:24 am
The case is Robinson v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia September 23, 2011 Gonzalez-Droz v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
Of course, there are various defenses that employers, insurance carriers, and their servicing agents may raise to contest an employee’s right to recover benefits, such as untimely notice of an injury, misrepresentation, and even fraud. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 9:15 am
Levinson and the standard for scienter under Tellabs v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 7:00 am
See Tucker v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 7:00 am
See Tucker v. [read post]
