Search for: "Tucker v. Tucker" Results 181 - 200 of 1,164
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2019, 6:30 am by Andrew Hamm
Briefly: Tucker Higgins of CNBC covers Monday’s request (in June Medical Services, LLC v. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 11:51 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Tucker has litigated many cases concerning the rights of patients with terminal illness, including Glucksberg v WA, Quill v NY, Baxter v Montana, Bergman v Eden Medical Center, Hargett v Vitas, AIMS et al v DEA.Plaintiffs are also represented by leading disability rights litigator Cat Cabalo and civil rights litigator Adam Wolf of Peiffer Wolf. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 4:34 am
Here is an excerpt from that case:This case requires us to reexamine the jurisdictional boundary between the Tucker Act and the Administrative Procedure Act, as that boundary is understood in the light of the Supreme Court's decision in Bowen v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
James Muir, Eric Tucker, and Bruce Ziff (Osgoode Society and Irwin Law, 2012). [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 2:28 am
In (1) James Robert Tucker (2) Jeremy Spratt (Joint Supervisors of Energy Holdings (No 3)(in liquidation) v Gold Fields Mining LLC [2009] EWCA Civ 173 the Joint Supervisors (JS) of a Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA) appealed against a decision that they had wrongly excluded a claim form on the grounds that it had been out of time.Gold Fields Mining (GFM) lodged a claim form for $230m in respect of the CVA of Energy Holding (No3) on 21 June 2007, some time after the deadline for… [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 12:25 pm
Earlier this week, I posted on a $4M verdict in federal court in a retaliation case, Tucker v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 6:39 am by John Jascob
” The Tucker Act deprived the court of jurisdiction over unilateral and implied-in-fact contract claims seeking to hold the government liable for its regulatory and sovereign acts related to securities markets (Grady v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]