Search for: "Tuckey v. Tuckey"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2007, 2:02 am
Borrower’s informed consent necessary Hurstanger Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2006, 8:19 am
Suckers for punishment: Qualtex go down in CAThe IPKat has just learned, via All England Direct, that the Court of Appeal has dismissed what he assumed was always going to be a hopeless appeal in Dyson Ltd v Qualtex (UK) Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 166 (Tuckey, Jacob and Lloyd LJJ).Dyson, a company that designed and made vacuum cleaners, sued Qualtex for infringing its unregistered design right after Qualtex started making spare parts for Dyson cleaners. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 11:53 am
LJ Tuckey notes that Novacold, which was taken as the authority for the proposition, was a judgment of LJ Mummery, who then took a very sceptical view of the Malcolm formulation in S v Floyd. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 7:15 am
" Id. at 241-42 (quoting Tuckey v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 4:16 am
Tuckey v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 5:15 am
In Chohan v McManus [2008] EWCA Civ 1657 the Court of Appeal was considering what constituted occupation of premises for the purposes of an Assured Tenancy. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 5:15 am
In Chohan v McManus [2008] EWCA Civ 1657 the Court of Appeal was considering what constituted occupation of premises for the purposes of an Assured Tenancy. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 10:03 am
Lord Justice Tuckey, delivering the lead appeal judgment, said that the fact that it was a public liability insurance policy was "a strong pointer to the meaning of the words used" although was not conclusive since the wording of the particular policy could extend the cover typically provided by public liability insurance. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 7:53 am
" Id. at 241-42 (quoting Tuckey v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 6:24 am
Yesterday the Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Tuckey, Jacob and Moore-Bick) dismissed Inpro and T-Mobile's appeal at [2007] EWCA Civ 51. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:32 am
This argument succeeded at first instance before Mr Justice Simon, who found Kookmin liable; however, that judgment was overturned by the Court of Appeal (Patten and Thorpe LJJ; Tuckey LJ dissenting). [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:31 pm
Buxton LJ gave a concurring judgment and Tuckey LJ agreed with both. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 9:36 am
Sir Simon Tuckey simply agreed. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:42 am
Sir Simon Tuckey was not impressed. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:42 am
Sir Simon Tuckey was not impressed. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 1:24 am
Knives out for hindsightIn Ferag AG v Muller Martini Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 15, here on BAILII, the Court of Appeal for England and Wales gave its ruling yesterday on a tricky question relating to hindsight when viewing the prior art. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:34 pm
Significantly, in Day v Coltrane [2003] 1 WLR 1379, while finding that tendering of a cheque for rent arrears before a possession hearing counted as payment (on the conditional basis), Tuckey LJ added “In the absence of express or implied agreement, the landlord is not bound to accept a last-minute cheque. [read post]
