Ct. 2567 (2011), which is why Bartlettwas first in line after Mensing was decided), but rather because the plaintiff’s treating physician never read the defendant’s package insert:[The prescriber] admitted at his deposition that he never reviewed [defendant’s generic drug] label before treating [plaintiff] and that “nothing about it influenced [his] prescribing of the drug” or what he told [plaintiff] about it. [read post]