Search for: "Two's Company Inc. v. Hudson et al"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2021, 5:00 pm
Sims, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 11:06 pm
Miller, et al Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitCOBRA; EQUITABLE ESTOPPELBOGGS, Chief Judge. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 8:09 pm
Because the plant manager had not personally, that is had not in his own dealings with the Applicant, discriminated against him, he could not be held liable under the Code for the actions of the employer, even if those actions were themselves discriminatory.PROCEDURAL RULINGSEllis et al v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 10:14 pm
[the Respondent's] control," as required under NLRB v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 9:42 am
Rushaid, et al. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Newport News School Bd, et al. , 2023 Va. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(The Prior Art) Ways to avoid a USPTO ethics investigation (IP Updates) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Qualcomm penalised for failure to disclose patents to standard setting organisation and for litigation misconduct in failing to produce evidence: Qualcomm Inc v Broadcom Corp (IP Law Observer) (Patently-O) (Promote the Progress) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (PLI) CAFC upholds judgment enjoining inventor from asserting patent against Unitronics or… [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 7:49 pm
As well, given that single studies typically lack the statistical power to detect small effects, many apparent inconsistencies can often be attributed to the chance fluctuations expected among studies with varying sample sizes (Rosenthal & DiMatteo, 2000).Hall's (1995) meta-analysis included 12 studies that appeared after Furby et al.'s (1989) narrative review. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WIPO Copyright Committee 16th session to discuss Broadcast Treaty, new proposal for exceptions and limitations agreement: (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (IPwar’s), (Intellectual Property Watch), (KEI), (Public Knowledge), (IP Justice), (IP Justice), (KEI),… [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
American Honda Motor Company, Inc. (2000) 529 U.S. 861, 868, 120 S.Ct. 1913, 146 L.Ed.2d 914) (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) “[A] reading of the express pre-emption provision that excludes common-law tort actions gives actual meaning to the saving clause's literal language, while leaving adequate room for state tort law to operate-for example, where federal law creates only a floor, i.e., a minimum safety standard. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am
Landow Aviation LP, et al. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
FDA's guidance documents, including this guidance, do not establish legally enforceable responsibilities. [read post]
