Search for: "Two Bulls v. United States of America"
Results 41 - 60
of 92
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2019, 9:02 pm
Bull, research director of the Administrative Conference of the United States; Colleen V. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 7:34 am
• The stated purpose of the corporation in the charter is “to continue the operation of an Episcopal Diocese under the Constitution and Canons of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 4:42 am
Drive Automotive Industries of America, Inc. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:51 am
(B) The drug or other substance has a currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Two major and intertwined challenges might limit or delay the application of this processing method in the market place for fresh iceberg lettuce and spinach despite FDA’s approval: 1) consumer acceptance of the technology and 2) costs to the leafy green industry to implement the process. [read post]
8 May 2012, 7:00 am
[filed May 4, 2012]IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION and NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION,Plaintiffs, v.UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, and LISA JACKSON, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency,Defendants. ))))) Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-00243-) RLW) (J udge Robert L. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
" According to the original and superseding indictments filed in Manhattan federal court: The original indictment, United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
" According to the original and superseding indictments filed in Manhattan federal court: The original indictment, United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
For example, in Nichols v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:36 am
THE BASIC PROBLEM AND YOUR OPPORTUNITY UNFORTUNATELY, every imaginable class of lie, fraud, and deception arises during the above two paragraphs’ events. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:31 pm
Lange v ABC and Gardiner v Durie do not get a mention. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 5:31 am
At first blush, this might seem as if it’s just an unfortunate reflection of private ownership, which is what the Minnesota Supreme Court held in State v. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 3:40 pm
Cuomo v. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 11:24 am
Classic, 313 U.S. 299 (1941); • destroy ballots, United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:43 pm
UNI has signed over 50 Global Agreements with multinational companies to secure respect for workers’ rights in Africa, the Americas, Asia Pacific and Europe. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm
Yves Saint Laurent America, Inc. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 4:37 am
The case is United States of America v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am
(IP Dragon) Bridgestone v Bull – prior design defence in China (Class 99) Yao Ming wants to reign supreme over Yao Ming era (IP Dragon) An SME handbook for China. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
North America, Inc., 971 A.2d 1228 (Pa. 2009), but dismissed the appeal as improvidently granted after it turned out that the defendant was an intermediate seller, not a true manufacturer (that makes a difference in the Third Restatement, but it’s not important here).Finally, the Third Circuit got fed up with the issue remaining undecided, and after trying unsuccessfully to get the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to accept a certified question, took the metaphorical bull by the… [read post]
