Search for: "Twomey v. State"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2015, 8:32 am
State v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 2:55 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Miskovic & Anor v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Rev 1) [2011] EWCA Civ 16 (20 January 2011) Swain- Masonn & Ors v Mills & Reeve (a firm) [2011] EWCA Civ 14 (20 January 2011) Rohlig (UK) Ltd v Rock Unique Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 18 (20 January 2011) Bellway Homes Ltd v Beazer Homes Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 15 (20 January 2011) Crema v Cenkos Securities Plc [2010] EWCA Civ 10 (20 January 2011) … [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:30 am
State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 8:06 am
Twomey, 404 U. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 3:50 am
In any event, whether plaintiff can ultimately prevail on these allegations is not relevant on this pre-answer motion to dismiss (see Endless Ocean, LLC v Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, 113 AD3d 587, 589 [2d Dept 2014]). [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 4:33 am
Here, accepting the facts alleged in the complaint as true, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, the plaintiff stated a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see Tooma v Grossbarth, 121 AD3d at 1095-1096; Endless Ocean, LLC v Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, 113 AD3d 587, 589 [2014]; Reynolds v Picciano, 29 AD2d 1012, 1012 [1968]). [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:40 pm
Rosmarie Feuerbach Twomey. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 4:28 am
The defendant’s evidentiary submissions did not establish that a material fact alleged in the complaint is not a fact at all and that no significant dispute exists regarding it (see Lopez v Lozner & Mastropietro, P.C., 166 AD3d 871, 873; see also Endless Ocean, LLC v Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, 113 AD3d at 589). [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 4:16 am
” “Here, accepting the facts alleged in the complaint as true, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, the plaintiff stated a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see Tooma v Grossbarth, 121 AD3d at 1095-1096; Endless Ocean, LLC v Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, 113 AD3d 587, 589; Reynolds v Picciano, 29 AD2d 1012, 1012). [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 6:11 am
The recent Supreme Court decision in Rent-A-Center v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 2:03 pm
The leading California case on a stockbroker's fiduciary duty is Twomey v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 10:37 am
I missed the first one, United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:29 am
In his opposition affidavit, David states that he has no recollection of receiving it, and Singer’s claim that the letter was mailed does not give rise to the presumption of receipt, as he does not present evidence of defendant firm’s office practices pertinent to mailing (see Lindsay v Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano LLP, 129 AD3d 790, 793 [2d Dept 2015]; Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, LLP v Brophy, 19 AD3d 161, 162 [1 st Dept… [read post]
22 May 2011, 7:00 pm
The Court of Appeal emphasised earlier this week in R v Dobson that “compelling evidence” does not mean that the evidence must be irresistible, or that absolute proof of guilt is required. [read post]
20 May 2011, 4:38 am
"The Garner Transcripts: That v. [read post]
22 May 2021, 2:46 pm
The social events and legislative history leading to the enactment and promulgation of the NSL as a national law applied to the HKSAR under BL 18 have been summarised in HKSAR v Lai Chee Ying, ante. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 4:11 pm
Bokova v Associated Newspapers, hearing 8 February 2018 (Dingemans J). [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm
Tara Twomey, National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys, San Jose, CA, submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys. [read post]
