Search for: "Twomey v. Twomey"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2011, 2:37 am
Regina v Twomey and others (No 2) [2011] EWCA Crim 8; [2011] WLR (D) 10 “The question whether a trial should proceed as a trial by judge and jury or trial by judge alone was concerned exclusively with the mode of trial, and the process of deciding whether the guilt of the defendant was established was entirely distinct from the question of how the tribunal responsible for making that decision was constituted. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 2:32 am
Regina v Twomey (John); Regina v Blake (Peter); Regina v Cameron (Glen); Regina v Hibberd (Barry) Court of Appeal “A defendant's right to a fair trial was not prejudiced by holding a criminal trial without a jury, where the danger of jury tampering was very significant and was not sufficiently addressed by proposed protective measures. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
My friend, Bill Twomey, suggested a post describing how to get copies of securities and franchise filings made with the Department of Corporations. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 10:27 am
Twomey, Katherine Twomey, Lior Strahilevitz, Matthew Bowers, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts, Reverse Benchslap, Richard Posner, Scott Hemphill, SCOTUS, Statutory Interpretation, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Clerks, The New Republic [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 2:39 am
Aisling Twomey writes in the Irish Examiner about how travellers would thrive if they were given the opportunity. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 2:39 am
Aisling Twomey writes in the Irish Examiner about how travellers would thrive if they were given the opportunity. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 2:55 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Miskovic & Anor v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Rev 1) [2011] EWCA Civ 16 (20 January 2011) Swain- Masonn & Ors v Mills & Reeve (a firm) [2011] EWCA Civ 14 (20 January 2011) Rohlig (UK) Ltd v Rock Unique Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 18 (20 January 2011) Bellway Homes Ltd v Beazer Homes Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 15 (20 January 2011) Crema v Cenkos Securities Plc [2010] EWCA Civ 10 (20 January 2011) Nokia GmbH… [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 3:50 am
In any event, whether plaintiff can ultimately prevail on these allegations is not relevant on this pre-answer motion to dismiss (see Endless Ocean, LLC v Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, 113 AD3d 587, 589 [2d Dept 2014]). [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 4:28 am
The defendant’s evidentiary submissions did not establish that a material fact alleged in the complaint is not a fact at all and that no significant dispute exists regarding it (see Lopez v Lozner & Mastropietro, P.C., 166 AD3d 871, 873; see also Endless Ocean, LLC v Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, 113 AD3d at 589). [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 4:16 am
” “Here, accepting the facts alleged in the complaint as true, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, the plaintiff stated a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see Tooma v Grossbarth, 121 AD3d at 1095-1096; Endless Ocean, LLC v Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, 113 AD3d 587, 589; Reynolds v Picciano, 29 AD2d 1012, 1012). [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 8:32 am
Lego v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 8:06 am
Twomey, 404 U. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 4:33 am
Here, accepting the facts alleged in the complaint as true, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, the plaintiff stated a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see Tooma v Grossbarth, 121 AD3d at 1095-1096; Endless Ocean, LLC v Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, 113 AD3d 587, 589 [2014]; Reynolds v Picciano, 29 AD2d 1012, 1012 [1968]). [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:40 pm
Rosmarie Feuerbach Twomey. [read post]
22 May 2011, 7:00 pm
The Court of Appeal emphasised earlier this week in R v Dobson that “compelling evidence” does not mean that the evidence must be irresistible, or that absolute proof of guilt is required. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 2:03 pm
The leading California case on a stockbroker's fiduciary duty is Twomey v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:30 am
Lego v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:29 am
No. l [Complaint], ,i 102)” “Accepting the complaint as true and according plaintiff the benefit of every possiblefavorable inference, the subject complaint sufficiently alleges a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see Endless Ocean, LLC v Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo,l 13 AD3d 587, 589 [2d Dept 2014]). [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 12:39 pm
Schwab v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 4:38 am
"The Garner Transcripts: That v. [read post]
