Search for: "Tydings v. Tydings"
Results 1 - 20
of 20
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2020, 9:12 pm
Costella: Creditor/Debtor Rights Diane V. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 6:24 am
Tydings v, Greenfield, Stein & Senior LLP. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 6:09 pm
Several of you have asked for information about the status of the Technology Patents LLC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 8:01 pm
The case is Knox v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 2:39 am
Buechel v Bain, 535 US 1096; Mahler v Campagna, 60 AD3d 1009, 1011). [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:05 am
"Collateral estoppel bars relitigation of an issue that has already been decided in prior action, and where the part against whom the estoppel is being asserted had a full and fair opportunity to contest the issue in the prior proceeding (Tydings v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 12:27 am
State of New York, respondent
NEW YORK COUNTYLegal Profession Collateral Estoppel Bars Former Client From Asserting Legal Malpractice Suit Against Firm Tydings v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 5:00 pm
CIVIL PROCEDURE, ETHICS & PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE Tydings v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 3:33 am
Moreover, since the issue of MEI's capacity to commence an action was not determined on appeal, collateral estoppel does not bar relitigation of that issue (see Tydings v Greenfield, Stein & Senior, LLP, 11 NY3d 195, 200; Sabbatini v Galati, 43 AD3d 1136; Bergstol v Town of Monroe, 305 AD2d 348). [read post]
5 May 2012, 9:49 am
French v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 3:37 am
Under these circumstances, NYCM is not collaterally estopped from litigating the merits of the underlying action, as it was not provided "a full and fair opportunity to contest the decision now said to be controlling" (Tydings v Greenfield, Stein & Senior, LLP, 11 NY3d 195, 199, quoting Buechel v Bain, 97 NY2d 295, 304, cert denied 535 US 1096). [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 4:16 am
Because the arbitral findings establish as a matter of law that defendants were not the cause of plaintiff's losses, the motion court properly dismissed plaintiff's complaint (see Tydings v Greenfield, Stein & Senior, LLP, 43 AD3d 680, 682 [2007], affd 11 NY3d 195 [2008]). [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:45 am
Even assuming AMS was negligent in failing to move for attorneys’ fees, by agreeing as part of the settlement [FN2] to forgo any award of attorneys’ fees except for $20,000, plaintiff cannot show that but for AMS’s negligence she would not have sustained the loss (see generally Tydings v Greenfield, Stein & Senior, LLP, 43 AD3d 680, 682 [1st Dept 2007], affd 11 NY3d 195 [2008] [to establish proximate cause, the plaintiff must demonstrate… [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 8:25 am
That statutory silence led courts to conclude that exoneration clauses in inter vivos trust instruments generally were enforceable, except to the extent that they sought to excuse a trustee from liability for gross negligence, reckless indifference, self-dealing, or bad faith (see Matter of Tydings, 32 Misc3d 1204[A], at *6 [Sur Ct, Bronx County 2011]; Boles v Lanham, 55 AD3d 647, 648 [2d Dep’t 2008] [opining that a “trustee is liable if he or she commits a breach of… [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
And in Houston v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 4:16 am
Knox v Aronson, Mayefsky & Sloan, LLP 2018 NY Slip Op 09030 [168 AD3d 70] December 27, 2018 Singh, J. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:23 am
Co. v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, 56 AD3d 1, 11 [1st Dept 2008]). [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 10:10 am
Consumers paid significantly more for goods, the AGs recall, during the years of the "fair trade laws" (Miller-Tydings Act of 1937 and the McGuire Act of 1952). [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 12:21 pm
Supreme Court case Laird v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 5:33 pm
The Ninth Circuit in Dukes v. [read post]
