Search for: "Tyree v. Stone"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2018, 1:49 am
The issue recently arose for consideration in Bridgestone Corporation and Bridgestone Licensing Services, Inc. v Deestone Limited [2018] SGIPOS 5.Background Opposition proceedings were filed in the Registry against Thai tyre manufacturer Deestone Limited’s application for “ ” in Class 12 for “Automobile tires; Motorcycle tires; Bicycle tires” and other goods (the “Application Mark”). [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
In Bibi v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 3:19 pm
General Tire & Rubber Co v Firestone Tyre & Rubber Co Limited [1972] RPC 457. [read post]
6 Sep 2006, 4:36 am
The case, Stone and Ashwell (trading as Tyre 20) v Fleet Mobile Tyres Limited [2006] EWCA Civ 1209, was more a contract dispute than an IP matter.Left: how fashions in tyre branding change - the comfort of Bibendum gives way to the harsh modernity of eTyresEssentially, Fleet (the franchisor) was taking a bigger percentage on the sale of eTyres that were bought on its website and then fitted by Tyre 20 (the franchisee). [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 1:15 am
So, for example, under the old Act the Full Court held it was not use the trade mark ROLLING STONES as a trade mark to sell bootleg recordings of the Rolling Stones performing by reference to the name ROLLING STONES. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
In these joined cases, the Court took the opportunity to re-write the penalties doctrine, which had not been considered by the House of Lords or Supreme Court since the 1914 case of Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd [1914] UKHL 1. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:54 am
Note in the example above how many times he’s posted about Tyre Nichols at the height of the dialogue in 2023. [read post]
