Search for: "Tyrrell v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2017, 2:53 am by Walter Olson
Tyrrell, enabling it to revisit its line of cases (especially Daimler AG v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 1:15 pm by Stephanie M. Batchelder
Tyrrell, 581 U.S. __ (May 30, 2017) (“Tyrrell”), the United States Supreme Court held that the California Supreme Court was wrong to let approximately 600 non-California residents join 86 state residents in a pharmaceutical claim against Bristol-Myers in which plaintiffs alleged that it misrepresented the risk of heart attacks and strokes associated with the use of its blood thinner, Plavix. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 1:28 pm by Francis G.X. Pileggi
In 2005, after changing its focus, iGov won a 5-year $300 million contract with the United States Special Operations Command (the “TACLAN” contract). [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 8:57 pm by Jon Gelman
"Issue: Whether a state court may decline to follow the Supreme Court's decision in Daimler AG v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm by Ronald Mann
But since it has no home State in the United States, that means that in that situation, there’s no place for plaintiffs to come together and sue that person, correct? [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 8:18 am by Andrew Hamm
United States ex rel. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 6:00 am by Shea Denning
A week ago today, I sat in the gallery of the United States Supreme Court with twenty North Carolina district court judges listening to Chief Justice John Roberts announce the court’s opinion in Endrow v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:39 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]