Search for: "U S Steel" Results 101 - 120 of 293
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2010, 7:30 am
A notable example: In the 'Steel Seizure Case' decided by the U. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 11:56 am by Sharifi Firm, PLC
The plaintiff alleged he was harmed while working as a machinist for a company that contracted with the United States Navy to supply insulation for stainless steel piping. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:01 am by Elim
LAW LIBRARY level 3: K120 .S87 2017Richard Susskind, Tomorrow’s Lawyers: An Introduction to Your Future, 2d ed. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Sawyer (343 U.S. 579, 1952) (forbidding President Harry Truman’s seizure of steel mills during the Korean War to avert a strike), in which Jackson formulated a three-tier test for evaluating claims of presidential power. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:06 am
They made a U-turn and circled back to the park. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 7:03 am by Michael Geist
Those tariffs can target any sector, meaning they could be levied on dairy, steel or other sensitive economic sectors. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 7:50 am by Adams Lee
The last time similar tariffs were applied on steel products back in the early 2000s, many exclusions were granted that helped ease the impact of the tariffs on downstream users. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 7:41 pm
function fbs_click() {u=location.href;t=document.title;window.open('http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php? [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 5:55 am by Robert Kreisman
Related blog posts: $17 Million Settlement Reached in Death of Electrician Crushed by a Crane Hook Cook County Jury Signs Verdict for $2.4 Million for Injured Contractor Who Fell From a Ladder at a Steel Mill Dismissal of Construction Site Case Reversed by Court of Appeals; Sojka v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 3:00 am by Robert Kreisman
The district court judge began the court’s decision, explaining: “The principal of an independent contractor, who does not control the contractor’s working conditions, ordinarily owes the contractor’s employees no similar duty. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 5:00 am by Jon Hyman
Steel [pdf], which held that the time employees spent donning (putting on) and doffing (taking off) their protective gear is not compensable under their collective bargaining agreement by operation of section 203(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act. [read post]