Search for: "U VENTURES, INC" Results 21 - 40 of 153
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2024, 5:38 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
§ 501.203 (defining consumer to mean “an individual; child,…; business; firm; association; joint venture…”). [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 6:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Harlem Triangle, Inc. v Butts  2020 NY Slip Op 32163(U)  June 29, 2020  Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number: 656028/2018  Judge: Andrea Masley puts together some of the most powerful civil rights leaders, valuable real estate in Harlem and money. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Hindsight arguments concerning selection of one of several reasonable courses of action do not state a viable cause of action for malpractice (Brookwood Cos., Inc. v Alston & Bird LLP, 146 AD3d 662, 667 [2017]). [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 3:05 am
In addition, we had good representation from a nationally known research analyst and venture capitalists," Dr. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
At the time that plaintiffs invested their funds, their interests seemed aligned with Barkany , at least as to the expected profitability of the venture. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 3:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Yet, in  Scarola Malone & Zubatov LLP v Ellner     2021 NY Slip Op 31199(U), April 8, 2021 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 651324/2017 Judge: Anthony Cannataro that is what happens. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 3:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Gad v Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP 2022 NY Slip Op 34357(U) December 20, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 156841/2021Judge: Margaret A. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Matter of Harlem River Yard Ventures, Inc., Decision and Order, Index No. 602341/07 (Sup Ct NY County July 11, 2011), a dissenting shareholder case in which the court endorsed a discounted cash flow method and rejected post-merger tax benefits in valuing the company's real estate holdings. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Matter of Harlem River Yard Ventures, Inc., Decision and Order, Index No. 602341/07 (Sup Ct NY County July 11, 2011), a dissenting shareholder case in which the court endorsed a discounted cash flow method and rejected post-merger tax benefits in valuing the company's real estate holdings. [read post]