Search for: "U-Haul Co. of California" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am by Josh Richman
Earlier, he served from 1981 to 1996 in the House of Representatives, where he co-authored Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996—the law that protects Americans’ freedom of expression online by protecting the intermediaries we all rely on. [read post]
16 May 2023, 6:47 pm by Steven Gallagher
U-Haul Co. of California, the court denied plaintiff’s request to amend their Labor Code § 1102.5 [retaliation] complaint to add a PAGA claim and, instead, compelled the matter to arbitration. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:48 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
U-Haul Co. of Cal., the plaintiffs brought individual retaliation claims against their former employer under Labor Code § 1102.5. [read post]
23 Dec 2017, 5:00 am by Dean Freeman
U-Haul Co. of California, Dec. 11, 2017, California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two More Blog Entries: Study: 4 in 10 Drivers Admit to Phone Distractions Due to Their Job, Dec. 19, 2017, Orlando Car Accident Lawyer Blog [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 2:32 pm
U-Haul Co. of California, denying the defendant company’s move to compel its workers to arbitrate their representative Private Attorney General Act claims for wage-and-hour violations. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 9:44 am by H. Scott Leviant
U-Haul Co. of California (Sept. 16, 2016), the Second Appellate District, Division Seven, affirmed the trial Court's ruling that U-Haul could not assert an arbitration agreement to compel the plaintiffs to individually arbitrate whether they qualified as “aggrieved employee[s],” to determine in arbitration whether they had standing to pursue a PAGA claim.The Court agreed with Williams v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
  Here on the Reed Smith side of the blog, three of our core contributors are located in Pennsylvania and California. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:00 pm
U-Haul Co. of California, CCH Business Franchise Guide ¶14,481.Franchisor’s “Physical Presence” Not Needed for Income Taxation in IowaThe essence of the much-discussed recent decision in KFC Corporation v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 7:14 am by Mandelman
”  Unbelievable… you mean the people who haven’t made a mortgage payment in well over a year need the state’s help to come up with the dough to hire a U-Haul? [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 12:01 am by John Steele
U-Haul Co. of California: unpublished California decision once again trying to apply SLAPP to lawyer (i.e., a malicious prosecution claim). [read post]