Search for: "U. S. COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS"
Results 1 - 20
of 3,935
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2024, 7:55 am
Similarly, the Our Children’s Trust organization has achieved considerably more success in pursuing claims similar to those of the Juliana case that have been filed in state courts, in reliance on state (rather than federal) law. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am
Whether Nine’s claims are true will no longer be tested in court after the lawsuit was discontinued by Synergy 360 and Mr Milo. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:00 am
The USPTO would require the application/patent owner to agree that the subject patent will not be enforceable if any claim in the cited patent has been finally held unpatentable or invalid as anticipated or obvious by a Federal court in a civil action or by the USPTO, or if any claim in the cited patent has been statutorily disclaimed after any prior art challenge has been made. [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:10 am
Schwartz v Oshman & Mirisola, LLP 2024 NY Slip Op 31592(U) May 3, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 155780/2023 Judge: Dakota D. [read post]
8 May 2024, 7:25 am
Mar. 29, 2024), the Court of Federal Claims (COFC) reviewed the decision by the Navy to eliminate Raytheon Company (Raytheon) from a procurement to develop countermeasures against radar-guided missiles for the F/A-18 fighter jet. [read post]
7 May 2024, 8:00 pm
It also includes the Court of Federal Claims and the Court of International Trade. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:43 am
Kevin Emerson Collins, Patent Law’s Authorship Screen, 84 U. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 6:08 am
On July 1, 2017, Davidson sent Howard a profane and angry email opining that Trump “owes everything to AMI & he fucked u. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm
EPA, 573 U. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 1:05 pm
As we posted on Tuesday, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has at long last issued its final regulatory rule banning virtually all existing and future U.S. non-compete agreements. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 11:25 am
In addition to the civil penalty, the federal court settlement also requires Williams-Sonoma to submit annual compliance certifications, and imposes a number of requirements about the claims the company makes, reinforcing requirements from the 2020 FTC order: Restriction on unqualified claims: Williams-Sonoma will be prohibited from making unqualified U.S. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:28 am
In a recent decision, the United States Court of Federal Claims (COFC) said that an agency was overly cautious in rejecting an offeror based on a perceived OCI. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 7:19 am
Citing a federal appeals court decision, the FTC notes that “Congress took pains in drafting § 4 [15 U.S.C. 44] to authorize the Commission to regulate so-called non-profit corporations, associations and all other entities if they are in fact profit-making enterprises. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:56 am
Having three oral arguments before the United States Supreme Court in the same term is an accomplishment that only a handful of appellate lawyers can claim. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 7:19 am
The United States Supreme Court recently clarified the law that applies to federal workplace discrimination claims based on an employee’s allegation that he or she was transferred to a job they didn’t want for a prohibited reason. [read post]
History Shows the Supreme Court Knows How to Move Quickly, as it Should With the Trump Immunity Case
22 Apr 2024, 5:50 am
This claim was rejected by federal district court judge Tanya Chutkan in December 2023. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst., 593 U. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 11:02 am
Mayorkas, 598 U. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:12 am
” Impact of this ruling The Court’s ruling resolves a split among federal Circuit courts which, to date, have applied differing standards for the level of harm needed to maintain a Title VII claim.1 In fact, the Court’s opinion explicitly instructed lower courts to eliminate any “significance” requirement under the law, stating “[t]his decision changes the legal standard used in any… [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:03 am
" The Court unanimously ruled that DeVillier's claims could "proceed under Texas' state-law cause of action. [read post]
