Search for: "U. S. v. Amend*" Results 1 - 20 of 3,648
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2018, 3:29 pm
S. 48, 49, 57 (1964) (corporate tax records); McPhaul v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 12:40 pm
S., at 236—a decision more akin to a district court’s preenforcement review of a subpoena than the warrantless searches and seizures we considered in Ornelas v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:48 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
The exclusionary rule’s sole purpose is to deter future Fourth Amendment violations, e.g., Herring v. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 12:09 am
I don't blame the plaintiff's attorney, really--he has to advocate his client's interests. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:09 am by Phil Dixon
It’s an interesting case in its own right as an application of U.S. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:29 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Arizona and the Jury's Role in Capital Sentencing, 13 U. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 11:56 am
I've been meaning to look at the case of Paulin v Paulin [2008] EWCA Civ 900 in detail for some while, but other things have got in the way.The Facts: The only "obvious asset" available to satisfy the wife's financial claims was a sum of about £1,088,000, representing the proceeds of sale of a property that had been used briefly as a matrimonial home and then, following the husband's departure, by the wife and children as a home. [read post]