Search for: "U. S. v. American Express Co" Results 61 - 80 of 264
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2020, 7:40 am by John Elwood
(rescheduled before the December 6, 2019, and December 13, 2019, conferences; relisted after the January 10 and January 17 conferences) Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the January 10 conference) Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
Americans say in surveys they accept the technology’s encroachment because it often feels like something else: a trade-off of future worries for the immediacy of convenience, comfort and ease. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 3:02 pm by Saira Hussain
Chilling Effect on Free Speech CBP’s social media surveillance poses a risk to the free expression rights of social media users. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 6:24 pm by Peter Mahler
Rosania v Gluck As far as I know, the first case to raise that lurking question post-Raharney is Rosania v Gluck, 2019 NY Slip Op 32087(U) [Sup Ct NY County July 8, 2019], decided earlier this month by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Saliann Scarpulla. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
The rejected marks express opinions that are, at the least, offensive to many Americans. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am by MOTP
Rather, he stated that the factors relevant to his attorney's fees were (1) the amount in controversy, (2) the complexity of the case, and (3) his knowledge and experience—three of the eight factors set out in Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Stacey Lantagne: Internet Memes, Fanworks, and Copyright’s Authorship ChallengesMemes regularly involve © works; one opinion expressed: the public “owns” the meme because the public authors the meme even if not the underlying photo. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am by Joy Waltemath
Accordingly, the president’s subordinates were enjoined from implementing or giving effect to: Executive Order 13,836 Sections 5(a) 5(e), and 6; Executive Order 13,837 Sections 3(a), 4(a), and 4(b); and Executive Order 13,839 Sections 3, 4(a), and 4(c) (American Federation of Government Employees v. [read post]