Search for: "U. S. v. Basil in v. Corp"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2020, 7:32 am
Simply put, an “attorney’s conduct or inaction is the proximate cause of a plaintiffs damages if but for the attorney’s negligence the plaintiff. .. would not have sustained actual and ascertainable damages” (Gallet, Dryer & Berkley, LLP v Basile, 141AD3d405 [l st Dept 2016]). [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:51 am
” (Gallet, Dreyer &Berkey, LLP v Basile, 141 AD3d 405, 406 [1st Dept 2016] [internal quotation marks andcitation omitted].) [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
“An attorney’s conduct or inaction is the proximate [*5]cause of a plaintiff’s damages if ‘but for’ the attorney’s negligence ‘the plaintiff would have succeeded on the merits of the underlying action'” (Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 26 NY3d 40, 50 [2015], rearg denied 27 NY3d 957 [2016], quoting AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk &… [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 11:33 am
A. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2006, 8:33 pm
Firmaron en tal sentido los jueces Guibourg, Capón Filas, Porta, Ruiz DÃaz, Scotti, Catardo, Puppo, Fernández Madrid, Eiras, Rodriguez Brunengo, GarcÃa Margalejo, Balestrini, Ferreirós, Guthmann, Vázquez Vialard, Zas, Morell y Guisado.En tanto, los 9 camaristas que votaron negativamente a la pregunta del Plenario fueron González, Morando, Corach, Vilela, Zapatero de Ruckauf, Pasini, Lescano,… [read post]
