Search for: "U. S. v. Best"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2018, 10:00 pm
We work hard to ensure that our clients receive the very best expertise possible. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 8:00 am
Airways v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:53 am
Holland & Knight LLC v Walsam 316, LLC 2023 NY Slip Op 33748(U) October 17, 2023Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 654470/2022Judge: Dakota D. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 5:17 am
In Matter of Brady S v Darla B, the court was asked to decide whether it was in the best interests of the child to award sole custody to the grandparents or to the child’s father. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 5:00 am
Under Reg BI, BDs and their RRs must have a reasonable basis to believe that a recommendation: (1) would be in the best interest of at least some retail customers (Rule 2111’s reasonable basis suitability test); (2) is in the specific customer’s best interest (Rule 2111’s customer-specific suitability test); and, (3) if the recommendation involves a series of transactions, the transactions should not be excessive or place… [read post]
28 May 2018, 2:17 pm
(U.S.S.C., April 2, 2018, Encino Motorcars, LLC v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 5:00 am
Guido, 586 U. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 12:54 pm
In Matter of Daniel W v Lauren S the court was asked to determine whether to allow the father to relocate with the children to their hometown despite opposition from the mother. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 4:21 pm
People v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 11:50 am
In FCC v. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 9:20 am
It is almost axiomatic that "you go to the best law school you can get into. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 1:54 pm
S. 304, 315 (1900).)Later in the paragraph, the court quotes this really scary language from Brown v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 5:00 am
Under Reg BI, BDs and their RRs must have a reasonable basis to believe that a recommendation: (1) would be in the best interest of at least some retail customers (Rule 2111’s reasonable basis suitability test); (2) is in the specific customer’s best interest (Rule 2111’s customer-specific suitability test); and, (3) if the recommendation involves a series of transactions, the transactions should not be excessive or place… [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 9:08 pm
Symczyk, 569 U. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:01 am
This was certainly the case for u/redpanda891, who took to Reddit to after a disconcerting family dinner: “[Am I the A**hole] for calling my sister’s husband a piece of s**t because he’s representing my ex in our divorce? [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 11:42 am
The long-awaited hearing in the appeal of the Federal Court’s decision in Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 8:07 am
Lane, 489 U. [read post]
9 May 2010, 2:52 pm
Perhaps these are best reserved for review after the outcome. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:12 am
Indeed, LottoGopher’s description of its services seems drafted to route around Champion v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:06 am
Buck v. [read post]
