Search for: "U. S. v. Booker*"
Results 21 - 40
of 48
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2008, 3:11 pm
S. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
There’s been plenty of commentary on Sessions v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:27 am
The Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 9:05 pm
S. 404 (1972) (allowing nonunanimous juries in state criminal trials); Burch v. [read post]
5 May 2012, 1:00 pm
Council of City of New Orleans, 491 U. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:35 am
S. 220 (2005). [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 5:15 am
Taylor, 487 U. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 2:26 am
SmithCRIMINAL PRACTICE - Automobiles - U-Turns"Defendant's conviction is affirmed because he turned his vehicle 'around so as to proceed in the opposite direction on a highway' on which a "no U-turn" sign was conspicuously posted, and there is a rebuttable presumption the sign was properly posted. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm
United States 17-6856 Issue: Whether the “separate sovereign” concept actually exists when Congress’s plenary power over Indian tribes and the general erosion of any real tribal sovereignty is amplified by the Northern Cheyenne Tribe’s constitution in such a way that the petitioner’s prosecutions in both tribal and federal court violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 6:00 am
S. v. [read post]
10 May 2009, 10:35 pm
Bostick, 501 U. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 4:44 am
” 543 U. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 11:44 am
" 307 U. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am
That’s what happened in Culbertson v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 2:38 pm
United States 17-6856 Issue: Whether the “separate sovereign” concept actually exists when Congress’s plenary power over Indian tribes and the general erosion of any real tribal sovereignty is amplified by the Northern Cheyenne Tribe’s constitution in such a way that the petitioner’s prosecutions in both tribal and federal court violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm
United States 17-6856 Issue: Whether the “separate sovereign” concept actually exists when Congress’s plenary power over Indian tribes and the general erosion of any real tribal sovereignty is amplified by the Northern Cheyenne Tribe’s constitution in such a way that the petitioner’s prosecutions in both tribal and federal court violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U. [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:14 am
Judges may still decide to increase a sentence based on a defendant’s record ? [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 4:48 pm
It’s not for the Transparency Project to speculate as to whether this is ill informed or deliberately partial press commentary but either way it’s inaccurate. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
Rowland: The court held that under the facts of this case, Blakely v. [read post]
