Search for: "U. S. v. Brim"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2015, 2:19 pm
As a third reason for the application of the statutory percentage to the total parental income, is that courts, including the Appellate Division, Second Department, have, in fact, routinely applied the statutory formula to combined parental income as high as and greater than $200,000 (see Scheinkman, New York Law of Domestic Relations, § 16.34, at 679; compare Matter of Brim v. [read post]
Mayo Foundation v. U.S.: Supreme Court Brushes Off Medical Residents, Unsettles Agency Deference Law
13 Jan 2011, 3:30 am
Correll, 389 U. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:32 am
In Zelouf v Zelouf, 2013 NY Slip Op 32073(U) [Sup Ct, NY County Aug. 30, 2013], Justice Kornreich declined to invalidate the freeze-out merger of a corporation cashing out a minority shareholder’s interest in the business on the eve of a jury trial, rendering the member’s exclusive remedy an appraisal proceeding under Section 623 of the Business Corporation Law. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 6:36 am
See Cuyler v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 12:37 pm
" United States Telecom Assn. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
" According to the original and superseding indictments filed in Manhattan federal court: The original indictment, United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
" According to the original and superseding indictments filed in Manhattan federal court: The original indictment, United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am
Army of the indigenous tribes in the trans-Mississippi West, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, the labor injunction, Plessy v. [read post]
